Asitha Fernando brings Sri Lanka great hope after day-one valiance

In Test cricket’s conventional world, it’s unwise to ignore an unconventional Sri Lankan

Vithushan Ehantharajah22-Aug-2024If you were to design your ideal fast bowler, it probably would not share many physical traits with Asitha Fernando.For starters, they would be taller than five-foot-eight. Their front leg would be braced, and their deliveries would push the speed gun well beyond 83mph. And they’d almost certainly not be Sri Lankan or blessed with the Sri Lankan uncle’s paunch.But when it comes to craft and nous, you could do worse than take a handful of what Asitha is working with to season your dream hybrid quick. Because it was those, combined with undimmed enthusiasm that sparked day two of this first Test into life. Perhaps not all the way, but how could any fuse stay lit when the wind is blowing the rain sideways, and the cold so biting you have to double-check your calendar to make sure we are actually in August. But in climes not suited for even the most strapping fast bowler, this short king stood head and shoulders above the rest.His three wickets, for 68 so far, brought Sri Lanka great hope after day one’s valiance, even if England do come back on Friday with a lead and wickets to spare. Each of the batters pocketed were prime cuts. The second most productive opener in Test cricket since the start of 2023. England’s No.3, and stand-in Test captain, no less. And, lastly, the seventh-ranked on the list of all-time runs in the format.Related

Ollie Pope passes first captaincy test, though his own returns beg to differ

Joe Root proud of England's adaptability as he channels his 'inner Hussain'

Joe Root drops anchor as England go 1-0 up over spirited Sri Lanka

Mathews fights after Smith's maiden hundred, but England close in on victory

Jamie Smith stays in the moment to give England a glimpse into the future

The disappointment of missing out on Dan Lawrence’s dismissal at the start of the seventh over – HawkEye showing the projected path of the ball bouncing over the top of middle and leg – was made up for with the dismissal of Ben Duckett two balls later. Sharp movement into the left-hander, and some uncharacteristic over-balancing, pinned the front pad. This time, DRS came to Asitha’s assistance, but it looked just as out in real-time.Ollie Pope had the top of his off stump rocked, stuck in the crease, and in his swing as the bat came down at an angle, surprised as much by the movement as the amount of skid into him. Joe Root had breezed past 30 before being tied down by some reverse swing. A loose attempt to break a boundary-less run of 22 balls – having struck four crisp ones in his first 35 – gifted an edge low to Dinesh Chandimal, even if Asitha had earned it.There may have been clouds overhead, but a slow surface negated any real nip through the air. It also allowed batters to react to deliveries after pitching, even given the red flag of Pope’s dismissal, but particularly as the ball went soft.Asitha was the only quick to effectively tail it late before the outfield dampened that movement. His lengths were consistent throughout; operating primarily on a six-pence around a six to six-and-a-half yard distance from the stumps. The Sri Lanka brain trust had identified for success in these conditions, and it was no surprise that Asitha was the one to take up residence there immediately.Asitha, as he has done throughout his international career, stuck to his task throughout, skill and spirit shining through across the 14 of Thursday’s 57 overs from his fingertips. He may not fit the common ideals of fast bowling, that opening burst which had England 40 for 2 (later 67 for 3 with Vishwa Fernando’s snaring of Lawrence) and then 125 for 4 after seeing off Root, showed he certainly has the traits of revered tearaways.Eventually, according to Sri Lanka bowling coach Aaqib Javed, it will be abundantly clear by the end of the series that Asitha is not just an exception to fast bowling norms. But a prototype of one of the most revered (and studied) quicks of the modern era.”I told him that after Mohammad Asif of Pakistan I saw that quality in him,” said Javed on his skills, dropping that comparison in there like it was a run-of-the-mill observation rather than a grand statement referencing one of the best to ever do it.”Not many people know about his ability. Without changing his wrist, he can swing the ball both ways.”Javed worked with Asif, so he knows what he is talking about. And airing that opinion feels especially prescient here given Asif can claim responsibility for the recent lineage of English quicks. James Anderson and Stuart Broad credit him with bringing the wobble seam, which the former has been passing on to others long before his bowling consultant role began earlier this summer. Javed, as a seam and wrist position enthusiast, does not use the equivalence lightly.”I actually picked Mohammad Asif. He wasn’t in the system. That’s how I know Asif a lot. Sometimes you don’t know what happens with your wrist. He (Asitha) has now got different confidence levels. People change their wrists, change the shine (which way it is showing) – but Asitha is so gifted, and they (the batters) even don’t know which way it will go.”Of course, Asitha has a long way to go to replicate the on-field career and influence of Asif. Not to mention the eight inches in height difference.But if history has taught us anything, it is that in Test cricket’s conventional world, it is unwise to ignore an unconventional Sri Lankan.

A defeat after declaring, and Bangladesh's first Test win over Pakistan

All the key numbers from Bangladesh’s epic 10-wicket win in Rawalpindi

S Rajesh25-Aug-20245 – Instances of Pakistan scoring more than 448 in their first innings and going on to lose the Test match, as they did in Rawalpindi. Their highest first-innings total in a defeat also came at the same venue – 579 against England in December 2022. However, four of those five defeats came when they batted second in the Test. When they have batted first, only once have they scored more than 448 and lost: in Galle in 2014, when they made 451 and went on to lose by seven wickets against Sri Lanka.2 – Previous instances of a team losing a Test after a first-innings declaration having lost six or fewer wickets. One of those was under bizarre circumstances in 1976, when India lost five batters to injury against West Indies in Jamaica. The only other instance was in Adelaide in 2006, when England lost after declaring at 551 for 6 in their first innings.Related

  • Pakistan and Bangladesh penalised for slow over-rates in Rawalpindi

  • Masood: Pakistan made a 'lot of mistakes' over the last four days

  • Immaculately prepared Mushfiqur constructs a Bangladeshi epic

  • Rawalpindi road prompts Naseem to vent pitch frustrations

0 – Previous instances of Bangladesh winning a Test after conceding a 400-plus total in the first innings. The previous highest was 374, by Zimbabwe in Chattogram in 2014.ESPNcricinfo Ltd14 – Tests taken by Bangladesh to register their first win against Pakistan. They have now won Tests against nine out of 11 teams; they remain winless only against South Africa (14 Tests, 12 defeats) and India (13 Tests, 11 defeats). They have needed more than 14 Tests to register their first wins against two other teams – Sri Lanka (18 Tests), and New Zealand (16).9 – Home Tests without a win for Pakistan, since the start of 2022. Their last home win was against South Africa in 2021.5 – Losses for Pakistan in those nine home games – three against England, and one each against Australia and Bangladesh. This is the first time they have lost five matches in any nine-game stretch at home; their previous worst was four losses. Pakistan’s longest stretch without a home win is 11 Tests, between 1969 and 1975, but they lost only one of those 11 matches. Nine Tests is their second-longest home sequence without a win.ESPNcricinfo Ltd2 – Successive Tests lost by Pakistan in Rawalpindi despite posting 400-plus totals in their first innings. It is the first instance of this happening to any team at home in consecutive matches at a venue.191 – Mushfiqur Rahim’s score in Bangladesh’s first innings, the sixth-highest score by a Bangladesh batter in Tests. Four of Bangladesh’s top six scores, in fact, are by Mushfiqur.9/245 – The combined bowling figures of Bangladesh’s spinners in the match. Mehidy Hasan Miraz took 5 for 101 and Shakib Al Hasan 4 for 144. In contrast, Pakistan, who went in with four fast bowlers, had to rely on Salman Ali Agha for spin, and he returned figures of none for 145 in 42.3 overs. The fast bowlers from the two teams had similar figures – 9 for 374 for Pakistan, and 7 for 322 for Bangladesh.

Where does Ravindra Jadeja rank among the best bowlers in home conditions?

An in-depth study of bowlers at home, comparing them with other bowlers in the country; and home and away comparisons

Anantha Narayanan11-Oct-2024This article is about bowling on home grounds – by all bowlers, including visiting ones. A similar article on batting was published a couple of months back. The areas I have covered here are: How bowling at grounds has varied across countries and time periods.
How individual bowlers have fared with respect to other bowlers while playing in their home country. It is important to customise this to each bowler’s exact career span.
How bowlers have fared at home as against away.
One major difference in my coverage of the bowlers vis-a-vis of the batters is that I have covered the three interlocking aspects of bowling – the bowling average, strike rate (balls per wicket – BpW), and accuracy (runs per over – RpO) separately. This is warranted since these are distinct measurable components and will throw up many significant insights when they are handled separately. The other notable difference is that the batting article considered only batters in the top seven. This bowling one, on the other hand, looks at all wickets that fell to bowlers.Let us first consider how tough or easy bowling in each country was, by period.The batting analysis article had graphs by country. Here, I have provided only a summary graph, since the shapes of the bowling graphs are more or less similar to the batting ones. There is a difference of between 10% and 15% between the two values. There are two reasons for this variation. The batting average is only for Nos. 1-7. The bowling average recognises all dismissals, including those of Nos. 7-11. Also, the batting average takes run-outs and the similar methods of dismissals as dismissals. The bowling average only considers dismissals credited to bowlers.Here are a few randomly picked values for comparison, to illustrate this.Across all Tests, the batting average is 36.1. The bowling average is 31.7
Between 2000 and 2012, the batting average in Australia was 41.1, while the bowling average was 36.0
Between 1877 and 1939, the batting average in England was 32.1, while the bowling average was 28.1
Between 1970 and 1984, the batting average in New Zealand was 33.6, while the bowling average was 29.5
Between 1945 and 1969, the batting average in the West Indies was 42.1, while the bowling average was 36.9
The difference in all these instances is around 14%. Very few difference values exceed 15%.

The bowling averages are around 15% less than the batting averages for the top seven batters, and more importantly, follow similar movement patterns for most countries. The overall average is nearly 32, with the highest point for most countries coming in the first decade of the 21st century; batting flourished everywhere during this period. In the West Indies, the highest bowling average came just after World War II; over the last couple of decades the averages there have dropped, largely due to the decline in the batting quality of the host team in this period. In New Zealand, the highest bowling averages were in the years before and after World War II – in both those periods, the home team was quite strong.The two highest home bowling averages ever, of 37.7 and 38.2, were achieved in Pakistan, in the first two periods of the millennium. Here is a sampling of scores in the country in this period: 546 for 3, 528, 643, 675 for 5, 600, 679 for 7, 410 for 1, 636 for 8, 588, 603, 599 for 7, 591, 644 for 7, 765 for 6, 606, 555 for 3, 476 for 4, 252 for 0, 556 for 9, 657, 579, 612 for 9, and 565 – these 23 tall scores in 47 Tests do tell a story.Overall, bowlers had their best era in New Zealand during the post-war period. A sampling of sub-150 scores from the country then reveals the story – 42, 54, 125, 125, 132, 26, 74, 145, 77, 142, 133, 89, 149, 48 for 8, 129, 140, 101, and 148 – all 18 coming in 35 Tests. It was a tough time and place for batters (however, it must be said that most of these scores were those of the home team).Arguably the most balanced pitches are in Australia. Note the numbers. Leaving out the initial period, the averages are nicely grouped between 30.5 and 36.0. England has a similar grouping, but with slightly lower values. India too is similar, but with slightly higher numbers than Australia. Barring their first periods, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh have the best numbers in terms of balance between ball and bat.Bowler comparisons at homeHere I compare the numbers of a specific bowler in his home country, and the numbers all other bowlers achieved in that country during his career span, irrespective of the length of the bowler’s career – be it 188 matches or 14.Readers might justifiably ask me why I have put all bowlers, home and visiting ones, in one basket for this. Would it not have been better to separate the home and visiting bowlers? Let me answer it this way: There have been times when the bowling of the home team has been weaker – New Zealand in the 1950s, India in the 1980s, and so on. There have been times when the home team has been stronger – Australia around 2010, India recently, etc.Putting all bowlers together lets me take care of all such situations. Also, I do not want to make statements like “XYZ was better in comparison to his fellow bowlers, but not when compared to visiting bowlers”, which do not convey much. The bottom line is: how does a bowler’s performance at home compare with all bowlers who bowled there from his first Test there to his last? And that has been done effectively in this exercise.The table below is ordered on the ratio between the average of other bowlers in the bowler’s home country and the home average of the bowler. The qualification cutoff is 60 home wickets. Why 60? Because that number allows for a good chance that the bowler will have played around 15 home Tests. A total of 172 bowlers qualify.

Unlike batting, where Don Bradman was miles ahead of the others, with bowlers, it is an evenly spread field. Indeed, an unlikely bowler tops this table. Australian left-arm spinner Bert Ironmonger, with a ratio of just over 1.73, is at No. 1. He played 14 Tests, all at home, and took 74 wickets at a very low rate of 18. He outbowled his peers by a huge margin. Ironmonger was the bridge between two great legspinners – Clarrie Grimmett and Bill O’Reilly. Not many will have foreseen this specific entry.The second bowler is more predictable. Imran Khan, who was a master at home, is a hair’s breadth away from Ironmonger in second place. He averaged 19.21 and the others 33.11. Then comes Sydney Barnes. Another master at home, with amazing numbers: 13-plus, against 23 by the other bowlers. A modern great, Pat Cummins, is in fourth place, with a sub-20 average, which is way below 33, the value his peers have managed in Australia during his career. An underrated tall fast bowler, Bruce Reid, rounds out the top five with a 1.68 ratio. Muthiah Muralidaran is only a third decimal point behind. The next four bowlers will not surprise anyone – all were outstanding at home.Devon Malcolm achieved almost perfect parity in this comparison (with an average of around 34.4). As also S Venkataraghavan (30.4). An interesting, and expected, point is that 150 of the 172 bowlers have performed better than their peers.Carl Hooper, the batting allrounder; Trevor Bailey; and Ashley Giles are at the bottom of the table. No surprises there. Giles and Bailey were usually their sides’ fifth bowler, and Hooper was used to give rest to Wes Indies’ fast bowlers. He bowled a lot, though, and picked up a sizeable number of wickets.The next table is ordered on the ratio between the strike rate (BpW) of other qualifying bowlers in the country concerned and the bowler’s home strike rate and the strike rate of the other qualifying bowlers. the same cut-off of 60 home wickets is used.

Waqar Younis was a destroyer at home, requiring only 39 balls per wicket. That is a huge contrast to the 64 balls that all other bowlers, including Wasim Akram and Imran Khan, needed per wicket in Waqar’s time in Pakistan. Colin Croft was an equal, only fractionally behind; their figures are almost identical.A surprising entry is legspinner Walter Robins. He was leaps and bounds ahead of the other bowlers when he bowled at home – which was almost his entire career. Then comes Fred Trueman, a devastating fast bowler at home, who needed only 45 balls per wicket. Completing the top five is Imran. Let us not forget that his peers included Waqar for a certain period. The other end of the table is populated by Hooper and a couple of English spinners who needed a fair number of balls to take a wicket.Moeen Ali needed almost the exact number of balls per wicket as the other bowlers, around 55. In this table, 135 bowlers have performed better than their peers.The next table is ordered on the ratio between the economy rate (RpO) of qualifying bowlers in the country in question and the home RpO of the individual bowlers in question. The cutoff is: a bowler needs to have bowled at least 750 overs at home. A total of 144 bowlers qualify.

Having watched Bapu Nadkarni bowl, with metronomic accuracy, I am happy that he leads this table. Trevor Goddard had an identical home economy rate to Nadkarni, 1.59, but his contemporaries were slightly more successful than Nadkarni’s, to push Goddard into second place. Ironmonger is in third and is followed by two great bowlers of the 1930s, Hedley Verity and Bill O’Reilly.It is interesting to note that the top six bowlers played before 1960. The only modern bowler to feature in this list is Ravindra Jadeja, who is impossible to get away in home conditions. Though he has conceded 2.37, a fair bit more than the bowlers above him on the table, other bowlers in his time have conceded over 3, resulting in a high ratio of around 1.3. Karsan Ghavri brings up the rear with a ratio of 0.83. Two surprising entries in the last three are Bob Willis and Jeff Thomson, both top bowlers for their countries. Maybe the accent in their time was on taking wickets.Mitchell Johnson is the only bowler to have conceded the same number of runs per over (3.33) as his peers. On the RpO metric, 95 bowlers have been more economical than their peers.Home vs away comparison for a bowlerUntil now we have seen how the individual bowler compared with all the bowlers who bowled in his home country during his career. Now we move on to some relevant comparisons within a bowler’s career. These tables provide comparisons between the home and away values for the bowler.The first table is ordered on the difference between bowler’s away average and home average. The cutoff is 50 home and 50 away wickets – 149 bowlers qualify.

Another unlikely bowler heads this table. Bailey is, arguably, not among the first few bowlers you would think of who have the best performance away vis a vis performance at home. He was extravagant at home, conceding nearly 36 runs per wicket. On the road, he was a terror, conceding only 23. He was devastating in South Africa, taking 19 wickets at an average of 12.1. Tony Greig required nearly ten more runs per wicket at home than he did away. He was very effective in the West Indies, taking 24 wickets at 22.6. John Snow needed over eight more runs per home wicket. That is indeed surprising, given his home pitches should have been conducive to pace. Snow took 27 wickets at 18.7 in only four Tests in the West Indies.Sydney Barnes (17.96) and Joel Garner (19.74) are the only bowlers in this group to have sub-20 away averages. Shoaib Akhtar’s home average was almost the same as his away one (around 25.7). Forty-two bowlers have performed better away than at home.At the other end, Dilruwan Perera was very good at home and ordinary on the road. As were Hooper and Abdul Qadir, who found Australia and India tough, needing well over 60 runs per wicket. Qadir’s overseas wickets cost him nearly 50 runs each – the highest in this elite group, barring the true outlier, Hooper.The next table is ordered on the difference between bowler’s away and home strike rates (BpW).

Bailey is in second place here. The leader, O’Reilly, needed over 20 balls fewer away to take a wicket. Bailey clocks in at just over 18 balls. The problems Australian legspinners face at home are underlined when we see that Richie Benaud is in third place, requiring over 17 balls more at home per wicket than he did away. Snow, who was among the leaders on the bowling average metric, is in fifth place; Goddard snags fourth place.Wes Hall (around 54) and Saeed Ajmal (around 65) have virtually identical home and away strike-rate values. Only 40 bowlers in this analysis have better away figures than home ones.Vinoo Mankad required nearly seven overs more per wicket while bowling overseas to take a wicket than he did at home. Qadir too was quite ineffective on the road. Hooper figures near the bottom on this table too. If Mankad and Hooper bowled at both ends unchanged in, say, Australia, barely four wickets might fall in a day.The next table is ordered on the difference between bowler’s away accuracy (RpO) and home accuracy. The cutoff is that a bowler ought to have bowled 500 overs each both at home and away. A total of 184 bowlers qualify.

Again, an unexpected bowler tops the table. Max Walker has a difference of more than half a run per over while bowling in Australia against outside. So has Neil Wagner. And one cannot keep out Bailey, who was quite accurate at home but was far more difficult to get away overseas. Two relatively recent English fast bowlers, Willis and Darren Gough, were more extravagant in England. Finally, let us doff our hat to Alan Davidson, who conceded only 2.19 at home and 1.82 away.It is clear that the differences between the home and away RpO values are somewhat lower than the differences on the other parameters. No fewer than a third of the bowlers have variations of 0.10 RpO on either side.Three West Indian bowlers are at the bottom end of the table. Shannon Gabriel, Fidel Edwards, and Daren Sammy found the going tough overseas, conceding well over half a run per over more than they did at home.Javagal Srinath (2.86), Paul Reiffel (2.63), and Morne Morkel (3.11) have identical RpO values at home and away. Seventy-eight of the 184 bowlers have bowled more economically in their away matches than they did at home.ConclusionThe analyses have thrown up a few surprising names. The top bowlers are not at the top, unlike with the batting tables. Bailey is the standout bowler, when it comes to performing at home compared to away.A final comment on Jasprit Bumrah. It is clear that he would have been right up there on the first two tables. But as I write this, he does not qualify. At the end of the recently concluded Kanpur Test, he had taken only 44 home wickets in ten Tests.The complete data files for all the players who qualify for the tables in this article can be downloaded by clicking here.The quirky stats section
In each article, I will present a numerical or anecdotal outlier relating to Test or ODI cricket. This time the theme is: “The finer points of Test partnership records”. First, the records for each wicket, and the duration for which these records have stood.1st wicket: 415 runs by Graeme Smith and Neil McKenzie vs Bangladesh, Feb 2008 (16y 8m)
2nd wicket: 576 runs by Roshan Mahanama and Sanath Jayasuriya vs India, Aug 1997 (27y 2m)
3rd wicket: 624 runs by Kumar Sangakkara and Mahela Jayawardene vs South Africa, Jul 2006 (18y 3m)
4th wicket: 454 runs by Joe Root and Harry Brook vs Pakistan, Oct 2024 (2d)
5th wicket: 405 runs by Don Bradman and Sid Barnes vs England, Dec 1946 (77y 10m)
6th wicket: 399 runs by Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow vs South Africa, Jan 2016 (8y 9m)
7th wicket: 347 runs by Clairmonte Depeiaza and Denis Atkinson vs Australia, May 1955 (69y 5m)
8th wicket: 332 runs by Jonathan Trott and Stuart Broad vs Pakistan, Aug 2010 (14y 2m)
9th wicket: 195 runs by Pat Symcox and Mark Boucher vs Pakistan, Feb 1998 (26y 8m)
10th wicket: 198 runs by Joe Root and James Anderson vs India, Jul 2014 (10y 3m)The longest-standing record is the Bradman-Barnes one for the fifth wicket, which has stood for over three-quarters of a century, followedby the seventh-wicket stand by Depeiaza and Atkinson. That record is unlikely to be broken in the near future. The recent 199-run Chennai masterclass between Ashwin and Jadeja is a testament to the difficulty in breaking the late-order records.It is interesting to note that no fewer than six records have been broken this century. In an 18-month period during 2014 through 2016, three were broken, two of them within a month of each other.The record that is likely to stand longer than Brian Lara’s 400 not out is the partnership of 624 runs, the only time over 600 runs have been scored in a stand in a Test innings.England batters hold three of the records, while Australia, Sri Lanka, and South Africa have two each. Both the Sri Lankan partnerships were in excess of 550 – the only two on the list. No partnership record has been scored against New Zealand nor have they scored one.Surprisingly, India do not hold any partnership record. The 413-run record between openers Pankaj Roy and Vinoo Mankad against New Zealand in 1956 was broken in 2008.Talking Cricket Group
Any reader who wishes to join my general-purpose cricket-ideas-exchange group of this name can email me a request for inclusion, providing their name, place of residence, and what they do.Email me your comments and I will respond. This email id is to be used only for sending in comments. Please note that readers whose emails are derogatory to the author or any player will be permanently blocked from sending in any feedback in future.

A batting cyborg: Smith's personal electricity brings Galle alive

Whatever data is observable, he is still mining. No detail is too insignificant. Nothing escapes Smith’s CCTV.

Andrew Fidel Fernando07-Feb-2025Some batters have spectacular hand-eye coordination. Others have an extraordinary thirst for runs. Steven Smith has both, plus a personal electricity.He walks out to the middle in Galle on Friday, and long before he has the measure of this dusty pitch, or has his big shots humming, all the Smith fidgeting is there. There is the yanking of the pads. There is the twirling of the bat and switching from hand to hand. There is the self-chat. The bop of the knees as the spinner comes in. The pained gesturing to the ghost of a shot he could have played better.In other players, these are nerves manifesting. Is something wrong with this guy? In Smith, it is just the current that never stops running through him. Something is going very right.Related

  • Smith and Carey dominate with hundreds in double-century stand

  • Hail Steve Smith, the last of the 10k giants

Ten runs in, he hasn’t set the world on fire just yet. He has survived a hopeful review. He has been beaten on the drive. The shots he has played are of a high quality for a batter starting out on a turner, and early on the defence is of a quality that reflects his fresh status as a member of the 10,000-run club. Many greats have sculpted spectacular innings out of this dust – Kumar Sangakkara, Younis Khan, Mahela Jayawardene, Joe Root and Virender Sehwag – and started as unsteadily as Smith has.Smith is on his way to adding his own piece to this hall of masters, but what distinguishes him is that internal motor. Ten runs in, he is cocking his head to see what mid-off is doing, turning around to see how the square leg and deep midwicket areas are protected, shooting looks at the wicketkeeper, and glaring at spots on the pitch. Nothing escapes Smith’s CCTV.He has faced almost 19,000 Test-match deliveries by this stage, and is playing his fifth Test in Galle. But whatever data is observable, Smith is still mining. No detail is too insignificant. If a divot is left in the ground at fine leg by a diving fielder, you suspect Smith wants to know all about it.His first 50 runs is where the day, and possibly the match, turns. He had arrived at the crease at 37 for 2, his walk to the crease already so intense and purposeful it is as if he’s going somewhere way more important than the other 12 cricketers on the field. (If you saw someone stride through a corridor this way, you might assume there is a million-dollar deal to be sealed, or a baby to be delivered.)The reverse sweep is not a Steven Smith shot normally•Getty ImagesThere are shots Smith leans on through this passage while he is working his way into this innings. The cover drive, on the day, is one of them, and Sri Lanka start setting fields for it. First, there is one short cover in case a ball stops on him and he hits one in the air. There’s also the short leg in case a ball from Prabath Jayasuriya that doesn’t turn as much as Smith expects, and it comes off the inside edge.Then there are two catching covers, plus a short leg, and the slip fielder who had seen Smith edge one on 12, but had the chance drop well short, which would seem like Smith got lucky. But he has let the ball come to him rather than pushing out, and loosened his grip on the bat. That, in turn, means the the bat absorbs a lot of the ball’s energy and it won’t carry to the fielder. Smith’s brain has computed all of this, and has accounted for such contingencies.This makes him sound like a batting cyborg, but there are some supremely human moments. On 34, he plays a reverse sweep. This is not a Steven Smith shot normally, but when he is batting as well as he was on Friday, he has decided to make an exception – like a bouncer letting a friend through the rope: “All right mate, just when no one’s looking, you try sneak into this party”.Smith twists his wrists on the shot to get it to the unprotected deep-third region. Partly, this is that incredible hand-eye coordination, partly batting IQ, partly Smith CCTV. He knows that Sri Lanka have left that area unprotected specifically because they don’t expect him to play the shot. He had glanced twice at that area in the seconds before he played that shot, his head forever on the data-mining swivel powered by that livewire energy.By the end of the day, Australia are so dominant that they are looking at another match-winning lead•Getty ImagesThe basis for playing the shot is extremely sound. An AI batting consultant would probably recommend it. And yet it takes a human to take a step into the unknown to play a shot they have resisted on many of the almost-19,000 balls they have faced in their career.One risk pays off, and Smith takes another a few overs later, shuffling down the track to launch Jayasuriya into the sightscreen, before later sweeping the same bowler to get to fifty. On tracks like this, 37 for 2 can become 150 all out, and that, in turn, can become Tests lost inside three days. It has happened often to visiting teams. It happened to Australia in 2016.Smith goes on to make 120 on the day. Alex Carey, very arguably batting even better than Smith, and certainly sweeping better, gets to 139 not out off 156 deliveries. By the end of it, Australia are so dominant that they are looking at another match-winning lead.We can talk about Smith’s last 70 runs, and how he manipulated the fields. But, by now, we know how that story goes. Sri Lanka’s bowlers were tiring. Their captain had already tried several attacking fielding positions to get Smith out. And by that stage, Carey was flowing freely.Other greats have come to Galle and played innings that felt like daydreams. Not this one. This one was brought alive by that personal electricity.

Maia Bouchier's perfect daddy-daughter day

Proud father’s speech caps brilliant century from England’s debutant opener

Firdose Moonda15-Dec-20241:15

Maia Bouchier: My dad’s speech made everyone cry

Maia Bouchier and her father Anthony’s daddy-daughter days involved “sitting on the couch and just watching the best players in the world bat all day,” just like they did in Bloemfontein on Sunday. Sort of.Maia was the one doing the batting – and it was only for three hours and 42 minutes, so not quite all day – while Anthony was in the stands at the Mangaung Oval. He watched as the daughter he raised around the game flicked and pulled and eventually also drove her way to a maiden Test hundred on debut. Afterwards, he got to celebrate it with her and her England team.”My dad came into the changing-room, which was really nice, and he actually made a little speech, and everyone started crying. So that was really sweet,” Bouchier said at the post-match press conference. “Let’s just say it was along the lines of, ”I’m very proud and I think it was the best day of my life.’ And that’s what got everyone.”Emotions always run high around Tests, given the sense of occasion and history attached to the format, and especially around women’s Tests because of how rare they are. In the England camp, they have a tradition of the nearest debutant presenting the next one with their Test cap, which meant Maia was capped by Danni Wyatt-Hodge, perhaps a little later in her career than she would have hoped.Since Bouchier made her white-ball debut in September 2021, England have played five Tests and she may have thought herself in line for at least one of them. In 2022, she was part of an England A side that played against the touring South Africans but could not displace Emma Lamb in the Test side. Now, on the return leg, so to speak, she was given an opportunity ahead of Sophia Dunkley and there could not have been a better country for it to happen for Maia.Maia Bouchier and her father Anthony after her Test cap presentation•Gallo Images/Getty ImagesAnthony has connections to South Africa and facilitated tours between the English club he founded, Primrose Hill Cricket Club (PHCC), and South African sides in the Western Cape. Maia remembers going on some of those tours as a child, and spending time on cricket grounds in South Africa, at a time when young girls were scarce on the cricket scene. Though Anthony never played at a professional level himself, he has been heavily involved in the business of cricket. In 2000, he was one of the principal investors who created Wisden Online, which, three years later, bought this very website (Cricinfo, as it was called then). At the time, Maia was just four years old and would have known only the basics of her father’s love of the game. As she grew older, she would also have been able to gauge his ambitions for her.”Obviously, this is very special for him because he’s waited a long time for it as well,” she said. “What I remember was us watching Test match cricket together just for five days straight, sitting on the couch and just watching the best players in the world bat for all day. I think that’s what he really wanted me to do. Obviously this is my first Test and to just go out there and play how I did, I’m super proud of myself and I know he’s proud of me. So that’s all I can hope for.”Bouchier played with none of the nerves of a newbie and raced to 43 off the first 45 balls she faced; and 40 of those runs were scored in boundaries. She took advantage of anything full and on the pads, and South Africa offered plenty of both. Then, when South Africa tightened up, she changed gears and showed the patience of a much more experienced long-format player. It took her 25 deliveries of watching and waiting to get to fifty, but then only 54 more to reach 100. By that time, she was finding scoring areas on the off-side as easily as she had earlier found them on the leg-side and her straight six off Tumi Sekhukhune, to get into the 90s, will be a shot to find the image of and frame.Related

Heather Knight sees seeds of Ashes challenge in rare Test triumph

Heather Knight: Lack of DRS 'shows the status' of women's Test cricket

England romp to 286-run victory as Bell chimes in South Africa collapse

Ree-Mac rides the lightning as old-ball impact gives England edge

England seize control in new-ball onslaught as South Africa collapse

She paced her innings so well that, when Maia brought up her hundred, off 124 balls, she held the record for the fastest Test century scored by an England player. Less than an hour later, she had been overtaken by Nat Sciver-Brunt, who took just 96 balls to score the quickest hundred in all women’s Tests and Maia did not mind at all. “She’s a special player. I’m just so happy for her as well because she’s had a tough time and she’s had a lot going on,” she said. “I’m really proud of her as well. She’s just another level.”Maia has singled out Sciver-Brunt as the player she wants to emulate and, with a first Test century against South Africa, she has already done just that. She’s singled out her father as the person she most wants to make proud. However, she also did allow for a small moment of singling out herself and what this means to her, outside of being a dreamer or a daughter.”It’s the pinnacle,’ she said. “To make my debut and to get a hundred, is top of the charts, really.”

Rohit Sharma in Test cricket: a solid opener, yet a six-hitter

A look at the numbers from his Test career

Sampath Bandarupalli08-May-202512 Hundreds scored by Rohit Sharma in Tests, each coming in a win. No other player has ten or more hundreds in this format, with all coming in wins. Warwick Armstrong (6) and Darren Lehmann (5) are the other players with five or more Test centuries, all of which came in wins.9 Hundreds as an opener in Tests for Rohit. He was elevated to that role for the first time in October 2019, and since then, no other opener has scored as many tons. Overall, only four batters have scored more Test tons than Rohit in this period.

1 Rohit scored the most runs (2716) for India across the first three cycles of the World Test Championship (WTC). His nine hundreds are also the most for India, with the next best being five each by Virat Kohli and Shubman Gill. Only Yashasvi Jaiswal (52.88) has a better average for India in the WTC Tests than Rohit’s 41.15.50.03 Rohit’s average in Tests from the start of the 2019-20 season to 2023-24. Only eight other batters averaged 50 or more in this period for a minimum of 25 innings. Among Indians, Rohit’s average was the highest in this period, with the next best being Rishabh Pant (43.34).52.94 Rohit’s conversion rate of 50s into 100s as an opener – he converted nine of his 16 50-plus scores. Among the openers with at least ten 50-plus scores, only Shikhar Dhawan (58.33 – 7 out of 12) and Dennis Amiss (55 – 11 out of 20) have a better conversion ratio.ESPNcricinfo Ltd10 Centuries scored by Rohit in Tests at home, all of which came during India’s record streak of 18 consecutive home series wins. Only Kohli, with 12, had more hundreds than Rohit during this period. Rohit scored 2444 runs in this period at an average of 56.83, bettered only by Kohli (60.12) .69.4 Percentage of Rohit’s career Test runs that came in wins. Among those who have scored at least 3000 runs, only Adam Gilchrist (77.77) and Matthew Hayden (71.35) have had a higher proportion of career runs coming in wins.13 Sixes he hit against South Africa in the Vishakhapatnam Test in 2019, the most by a batter in a Test. In all, Rohit hit 88 sixes in Test cricket; only Virender Sehwag (90) hit more for India.

5 Batters to have scored hundreds in their first two Test innings, including Rohit. He scored hundreds in both innings he batted against West Indies in his debut series. Lawrence Rowe, Alvin Kallicharran, Sourav Ganguly and Yasir Hameed are the others who have done this, Rowe and Hameed in each innings of their first Test.30 Consecutive innings without a single-digit score for Rohit between February 2021 and July 2023, the longest such streak for any batter. Rohit scored 1401 in those 30 innings at an average of 50.04. He faced 2642 balls in that run, averaging 94.36 balls per dismissal.

Switch Hit: Cap'n Brook, Sir Jimmy

Alan Gardner, Andrew Miller and Vish Ehantharajah get together to chat about the start of the county season

ESPNcricinfo staff15-Apr-2025The County Championship is back in swing, England Men have confirmed Harry Brook as their new white-ball captain, and Charlotte Edwards will take charge of England Women. On this week’s podcast, Alan Gardner, Andrew Miller and Vish Ehantharajah got together to discuss the latest news, including Surrey’s slow start to their title defence and the continuing trials and tribulations of Zak Crawley.

Mathews defies drama, one last time

Angelo Mathews has never been the kind who seeks out drama, but it seemed to follow him around at many points in his career

Andrew Fidel Fernando21-Jun-2025Life isn’t perfect. Sri Lanka cricketers’ careers are even less so. Angelo Mathews knows this better than most.Long cricketing lives, the likes of which Mathews has had, rarely pass without incident. But in Sri Lanka, they are further enlivened by fights with the board, fights with coaching staff, galling accusations from ex-players, invites from sleazy politicians, the meddling incompetence of sports ministers, summary sackings from one group of selectors, and summary reappointments when the selectors themselves get sacked. If you’ve gained a little weight, Sri Lanka fans also do irreverence so casually that they will call you fat right to your face.Mathews has never been the kind who seeks out drama. In fact, he feels like an exceptionally uncomplicated player of 119 Tests and captain of 34. He seethes personally, of course – we all do. But usually, he was the guy who was getting sucked into the gravity well of Sri Lankan cricket controversy against his will. The vibe tended to be “why do I have to deal with this?”Related

  • Angelo Mathews: 'I lost a lot of hair during my captaincy'

  • Mathews' best – Rain man in Galle, Hero at Headingley

  • How Angie and SL took over the world in 2014

  • Test stats: reliable away from home, unfortunate in the 90s

  • Sri Lanka salvage draw in Mathews' farewell Test

And yet, occasionally, there were fires that burned through the ice. The most memorable occasion was one that made the context of his farewell Test a little spicy. We are not going to re-litigate the incident today, but the summary is that in a 2023 World Cup match, Mathews became the first international cricketer in history to be timed out, in what he felt were unacceptable circumstances. In response he poured no little scorn on the Bangladesh team, calling their behaviour “disgraceful” and accusing them of stooping low. It was, by his standards, ludicrously incendiary.But time heals, people mature, and life forces you to move on. Though there had been a little fallout over that timed-out incident in last year’s Sri Lanka tour of Bangladesh, Mathews already seemed to have got over it.Angelo Mathews and Mushfiqur Rahim had a little bit of banter going•AFP/Getty ImagesAnd in this match, the Bangladesh players could not have been sweeter to him, or more gracious. They didn’t quite form two separate guards of honour – one per innings – as Misbah-ul-Haq’s Pakistan (miss those guys) did for Mahela Jayawardene. But they spent many moments of the past five days patting him on the back, shaking his hand, smiling in his direction, speaking glowingly about his achievements, smiling some more.The vibes peaked on day five, while Mathews was playing his final Test innings, batting for a draw. Off the 43rd ball he faced, Bangladesh raised a big lbw appeal, and while they were reviewing the not-out decision, Mushfiqur Rahim came over to Mathews, and had a long, playful conversation, which ended with Mathews stroking Mushfiqur’s beard. After play, Mathews revealed what had been said.”Mushfiq kept chirping, and he wanted me to go for big shots,” Mathews said. “I said, ‘no, Mushfiq, I’ve played with you since Under-19s and I know you very well – and this is not the time for me to go for big shots; obviously, we want to draw this game’.”The subtext to Mushfiqur’s suggestions was that Mathews should be throwing his bat a little bit as this was his final innings. He should be having fun. In the first innings, Mathews had got down into a one-handed sweep that went all the way for six, which felt like a vintage Mathews moment – the kind of shot he would have nailed ten years ago. But here, Sri Lanka’s chances of victory were so remote after the first two wickets fell, the dressing room had wanted caution, and Mathews – maybe the last Sri Lanka cricketer to retire with more than 100 Tests to his name – spent his final afternoon in the format defending.Angelo Mathews meets and greets fans after his final Test•AFP/Getty ImagesIt was fitting in its own way. Where other batters, particularly the younger ones, had developed their attacking games first, Mathews’ aggression always seemed to stem from having a solid defensive technique. His playing of the bouncer was a case in point. Although he was one of the most natural pullers and hookers of the ball in Sri Lanka’s Test history (behind only Aravinda de Silva, perhaps), Mathews was equally good at ducking, weaving, dead-batting steepling bounce, swivel-pulling away for singles, and fending rib-crushers into space.In fact, one of the great low-key cricket (as opposed to Big Three cricket) battles of the past 15 years was Mathews vs Neil Wagner. That short ball was basically the reason for Wagner’s cricketing existence, particularly when New Zealand were hunting for second-innings wickets on pitches that had lost their juice. Mathews was that rare South Asian batter who enjoyed facing short-pitched bowling. One time, in a Dunedin Test in 2015, Wagner out-thunk him – peppering him with nasty short ones before slipping a full one in at the stumps, which Mathews, incredibly, tried to pad away. He got bowled instead. Three years later, Wagner spent all day trying to break through Mathews’ defence on a Wellington track that offered good bounce, but couldn’t, as Mathews and Kusal Mendis defied them in a 109.1-over unbeaten partnership.On his final day of Test cricket, Mathews did not have much short, fast bowling to defuse but did need to see out some spin. Of the potential 222 balls Sri Lanka had to face, Mathews soaked up 45 – about 20%. No one is about to pretend these are great numbers. But life isn’t perfect, Sri Lankan careers even less so, and Mathews knows this.Still, there were the fans who thronged the banks and stuck around to high-five him when he came around after the presentation, the former greats who have paid him public tribute, plus the long (cobra) kite that went up over Galle fort’s ramparts bearing Mathews’ name and jersey number. A Lankan cricketing life is not without its own delights. For a man as averse to drama as Mathews has been, he has lived out an especially storied one.

Power, stance and backlift: how Iyer took his ball-striking to new heights

A three-day session in January with Pravin Amre helped him fine-tune his technique and be more balanced while responding to different types of deliveries

Nagraj Gollapudi02-Jun-20251:53

Moody: Shreyas identified key moments to go into the fifth gear

Since his last-minute inclusion in the first match of the home ODI series against England in February, Shreyas Iyer has been playing match-winning, as well as impact, innings both for India and, in the past two months, in IPL 2025 where he is captain of Punjab Kings. The latest example of that came on Sunday evening in Ahmedabad, where Iyer batted like a man possessed: his undefeated 87 helped PBKS make only their second IPL final, and the first since 2014. It was a remarkable effort as Iyer responded under pressure to bring down five-time champions Mumbai Indians.Iyer was the second-highest run-scorer in both the England ODIs as well as the Champions Trophy, and is now sixth among the leading run-makers in IPL 2025. His success is not by accident.About a week prior to the first ODI against England, played in Nagpur on February 6, Iyer had a three-day session in his hometown of Mumbai with former India batter Pravin Amre, who has been his long-term coach, since when he was 12. The primary focus, Amre said, was to tinker with the basic set-up in Iyer’s stance and make him more balanced to respond to any type of delivery.Related

An IPL final with the potential for great joy and heartbreak

The night MI felt the full force of Shreyas' ire

Stats – A captain's innings from Iyer ends MI's proud record

Iyer on his Qualifier 2 classic: 'I love big occasions'

“His issue was his base. His back [right] leg was collapsing in his trigger movement,” Amre told ESPNcricinfo in April.As a result of the leg collapsing, Amre pointed out, the head followed automatically, and Iyer lost his balance. What would also end up happening was that his right heel would be dragging outside leg stump and, with his head falling away, Iyer was vulnerable to all threats including failing to play the short delivery well.The challenge, though, was how to adapt to the new technique Amre was suggesting: how could he change something that had been lodged in his muscle memory?Amre assured Iyer that the purpose was not to “disturb” his overall technique, but it was to “add” something that would enhance his batting.”I had to undo that [the set-up]. The word I used was correction. I told him I’m correcting you to get you in better position, so that you get a better feel with the bat while playing the strokes.”While the general impression from outside is that Iyer had opened up his batting stance, allowing him to better tackle the shorter ball, which has been his Achilles heel forever, Amre said that the change was not recent. It was about a year ago when Iyer moved from a side-on to a more open stance. Amre said that had allowed Iyer to watch the ball better and with the tweaked stance, it allowed Iyer to stand tall and respond confidently. “Previously the ball was dominating him; now he can dominate the ball.”2:46

Iyer vs Hazlewood the match-up to watch out?

The best examples of the success of the January work with Amre were the successive sixes Iyer hit off Jofra Archer in the Nagpur ODI. Jos Buttler stood at short leg, so Iyer was aware of the short-ball plan. But when Archer pitched on a hard length on the fifth-stump line, Iyer quickly got in line to pull the ball high over deep midwicket. Next ball, Archer ramped up the pace to nearly 143kph, but it was once again wide outside the stump, so Iyer moved closer to it and, on raised toes, cut hard over the deep-third boundary.Probably because of the new set-up, one distinct change between the 2024 and 2025 IPL seasons is that Iyer is now playing the ball later, especially against fuller and good-length deliveries. According to HawkEye data, his average interception point with the ball in 2024 was 1.65m in front of the stumps. This year, it is 1.50m.During the January sessions, Iyer also fine-tuned his backlift. Unlike the traditional backlift, where the bat comes straight down, Iyer’s bat is now coming down more from the direction of gully. Amre said it was similar to the loop used to hit a forehand in tennis, essentially to derive more power. While it is still work in progress, over the last few months Iyer has dealt with the short ball in white-ball cricket more effectively, including in the IPL, as the numbers below show.ESPNcricinfo Ltd”That is why now you can see he hits the short ball more powerfully.”Amre, who was with Delhi Capitals (DC) until IPL 2024 for nearly a decade, has seen Iyer from his pre-teen years, and has coached him at his academy at Shivaji Park. It was Amre who had convinced the DC thinktank to recruit Iyer as he felt the Mumbai batter, uncapped then in the IPL, could become a long-term player for the franchise. Iyer did lead DC from halfway through the 2018 season and paired successfully with then head coach Ricky Ponting to take the franchise into the playoffs in 2019 and then the final in 2020.During his time as coach at Seattle Orcas in MLC in 2023, Amre noticed how baseball players derived maximum power with a static base. He felt he could utilise some of those observations in his work with Iyer.2:24

Iyer on Ponting: ‘I’ve never seen his emotions go up and down’

“Without momentum, the baseball hitters generate great power and the ball goes far. One factor is they work more on the core muscles,” Amre said. “With Shreyas, I wanted him to get optimum power behind his strokes, specifically against spinners, so he could clear the boundary.”To strengthen the core, Amre got Iyer to hit against weighted balls, also known as sandballs, which can weigh between 150-350 grams – as compared to the 163-gram limit set by the MCC for cricket balls – and are harder to hit far. But with practice, batters start to get the power and can hit through the line of the ball farther with faster hand-speed.According to Amre, to enhance the power-hitting ability, he told Iyer to imagine Kieron Pollard was standing at long-on, and the challenge was to clear him. Pollard was among the best fielders in those hot zones where he could intercept boundaries using his height as well as his highly athletic body. “The idea was to help Shreyas in not being afraid to hit over Pollard despite him being the world’s best fielder.”Amre sees himself as a craftsman who will continue to chisel at his work, in this case Iyer, to make him a better batter. And the reason he knows he is doing the right thing is because of what Iyer told him at the end of the January sessions. “I was very happy when Shreyas said, ‘Sir, now I can take on anybody’.”

A generational flaying takes its place in England's Ashes lore

It’s the hope that kills England, as crushing comedown leaves their bid for immortality on the rocks

Vithushan Ehantharajah22-Nov-20252:13

Stokes defends attacking approach after batting collapse

You know what, this might be the worst one. And there have been some shockers.Certainly, it’s up there with any of England’s previous defeats in Australia. This being their 100th, by the way. With a team mooted as having the best chance of winning a first Test match here for the best part of 15 years.Instead, England’s quest for a historic reclamation of the Ashes has begun with a loss as dispiriting and rancid as they come. It’s a potent mix that will take a long time to shake. Because the worst thing is … about six hours before this had curdled, England were actually winning.Swallow it down, it’s bad for you. And don’t fret about getting the taste out of your mouth. If you’re new to this, this generational flaying from a position of strength will make itself at home, burrowing deep into the sporting DNAs of the lineage of England fans to come.This could be Adelaide 2006-07 for the TikTok generation; the original was a slow-burn four-day tussle which culminated in Shane Warne’s fifth-day punchline. This remake has been condensed for shorter attention spans: hold the screen down if you want to watch England fast-forward from 105 ahead and just one down in the afternoon to an eight-wicket defeat before night-fall. Actually, don’t bother. It was quick enough in normal time.Travis Head blazed Australia to glory in the manner that England prescribe•Getty ImagesOr this could be an AI slop re-imagination of either of the first two Tests of the 1990-91 tour, and given that Graham Gooch described that series as a “fart competing with thunder” it’s a depressing comedown from the high-octane thrills of day one. That opening match at Brisbane trod a similar path to this one – the tourists were ahead by 42 on first innings then, compared to 40 here. The second featured an injury-prone left-armer, Bruce Reid, snaring 13 English batters at the MCG. Mitchell Starc (how can a big quick be this durable? He’s clearly AI) bagged his 10 in 24.5 overs.Or it could be another big-picture reboot from 2006, with the charismatic Travis Head playing the part of Adam Gilchrist’s previous Running Man effort in Perth. Sure, the background scenes were updated (how good does the WACA look with that filter, by the way?) but this one was even more impactful than the original. Mind you, the ending was exactly the same: England comprehensively thrashed.Related

  • 'Shellshocked' Stokes hails Head for 'knocking the wind' out of England

  • Ranking England's Australian nightmares

  • Archive: The Adelaide horror 2006

  • Head's 69-ball ton secures remarkable win for Australia

  • Stats – Perth serves up a short and spicy Test

Those waking up in the UK on Saturday morning got to take in all such horrors. And no, we’re not talking about TNT’s coverage, although some of the broadcast’s lamentable problems were probably welcome now. With the commentary frequently out of sync with the pictures, at least those of a sensitive disposition were offered trigger warnings for incoming England wickets and then Head boundaries.For the same bowlers who had covered for the batters after their first-innings collapse of 5 for 12 were all too quickly back out there as fodder for Head and, latterly, Marnus Labuschagne. Lightning struck for England when they managed to get all of Jofra Archer, Mark Wood, Gus Atkinson and Brydon Carse on the park at the same time, even as Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood were missing for Australia. But none of them could summon another significant strike 24 hours later, even against an Australian team whose one banker opener continued to not open.Joe Root dragged a drive on to his stumps•Getty ImagesEngland’s quartet could point out that more than 35 overs of rest would have allowed them to replenish the necessary energy to be as accurate and relentless as they had been on Friday. They might also note that their combined contribution of 66 runs on Saturday dwarfed the tally of most of their more seasoned and celebrated batters across both innings. Zak Crawley – backed explicitly because his technique was expected to suit Australian pitches – bagged a pair. More gallingly, Joe Root’s 0 and 8 made it seven single-digit scores for England’s top six.Root’s failures, however familiar in Australia, also came with a modern, debilitating twist, and that was before his solitary over of offspin (which put him four runs in deficit for the game) had brought the scores level ahead of Steve Smith’s winning boundary.England’s greatest batter was the last man to fall in a post-lunch collapse of 3 for 0 in six deliveries, which capped an overall slump of 9 for 99 to close the second innings. Root’s inside-edge into his stumps off Mitchell Starc came as he looked to drive on the up through the covers, despite the fact that Ollie Pope (caught behind) and Harry Brook (caught first slip) had just fallen to that exact shot in Scott Boland’s previous over. The thing about Root in this team is he knows better. But he didn’t when it mattered today.

They came to Australia searching for immortality. And no one will forget what they did here today.

Boland was a bowler reborn overnight, digging a trench on his usual six-to-eight metre length. England’s batters had made merry with him in their first innings, knocking him off his usual strides, forcing him to bowl fuller, and punishing his 10 overs to the tune of 0 for 62. Crucially, they had not been trying to hit the ball square on the off side with the bounce so steep.Maybe this is not what England fans want to read so soon after their side has lost 20 wickets in 67.3 overs… but were they too timid?Ben Stokes thought so, as he pointed out that the successful batters on a tasty Perth deck – Head, and to a lesser extent, Harry Brook and Jamie Smith with their respective 52 and 33 on day one – had succeeded in disrupting rhythms and off-setting routines by taking chances.Without naming names, Stokes had suggested the responsibility to do so should have fallen to the person with his eye in, which brings Pope’s second innings under the microscope. England’s No.3 looked solid in this match, particularly when driving down the ground. But after reaching 18 off 24 in his second innings, he came to a standstill. A run of 25 dots in his next 32 balls culminated in his dismissal to Boland, who had been responsible for 14 of them.Harry Brook walks off after making a duck•Gareth Copley/Getty ImagesDid Pope get bogged down? Maybe Boland, simply, bowled well, and was worthy of the calm? England ensured he would get his rewards, as he finished with 4 for 33 and kept that home bowling average low at 13.47. The rest of the team vibed off their popular quick’s thrust. And that is when England became footnotes in a story they had been writing.The small- and big-picture ramifications of such a defeat will be just as infuriating. Batting first here was predicated on getting the best of batting conditions, using India’s victory at the Optus Stadium last year as a template.The first innings followed the identical script. But they totally flunked the next, most important bit. Whereas India saw out day two, closing on 172 for 0, England were instead left sitting shellshocked in the away dressing-room.Never mind, at least Head put the better conditions to historic use. The most Bazball batter imaginable out-Bazball-ed the Bazballers. And not only that, Travball brought up three figures in just 69 deliveries, quicker than Gilbert Jessop, achieving the side-quest that has been a white whale for these English batters. He scored the runs that could have been theirs, and in the manner that they dream of … if only they could have made it through that sticky post-lunch period, into a movement-free afternoon and a 40-over-old ball …England have played with freedom. The pressure has been lifted off them for the past three years. And while they have admittedly had a decent amount of success, and won some spectacular Test matches along the way, they still haven’t achieved anything that could be classed as truly great.This was supposed to be the start of that. The first of the three necessary steps for the biggest crowning glory of all. Now they must wear one of England’s most inglorious defeats on Australian soil, and that is something they may never be able to shed.They came to Australia searching for immortality. And no one will forget what they did here today.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus