Yuzvendra Chahal aims for glory in the UAE 'heaven'

The legspinner talks about the concerns of losing his rhythm, working on new tricks with Adam Zampa, mentoring younger players, and more

Shashank Kishore02-Oct-2020Yuzvendra Chahal showed off his dance moves on TikTok, tickled many funny bones, and bantered with Rohit Sharma and Virat “” on Instagram during the lockdown. But all along, he was, just like KL Rahul, worried about his “rhythm”. Would he able to land his stock ball properly? Will he be able to deliver those “googles” with pin-point accuracy as he usually does?He resumed training in July with moderate intensity, but it wasn’t until he landed in the UAE – “heaven” in his own words, because of the bigger boundaries – that he actually tried to work on his concerns. Two months on, he’s happy with where his game is at. All the hard work in the nets, he says, is paying off.”During the lockdown, I practised for just ten days and before the first match, I was just worried about my rhythm,” he says, sipping a hot latte in his plush hotel room in Dubai. “For the past six months, I didn’t bowl in the match and I was a little bit nervous before I played the first match.”Compared to the earlier matches, there were 20 to 30% more nerves because I didn’t know how my rhythm will go. When I bowled my first over, then I was like ‘okay, my rhythm is there only where we stopped six months back’. I was worried especially about my googlies, the variations, whether they will be there or not. But I was very happy the way I bowled in the first match and that gave me so much confidence.”In the three weeks leading up to IPL 2020, Chahal was identified to be part of Royal Challengers Bangalore’s leadership group, alongside Virat Kohli and AB de Villiers. Mike Hesson, the director of cricket, has been particularly impressed with Chahal’s game sense, his ability to read different situations and adapt to different scenarios.

“I was worried especially about my googlies, the variations, whether they will be there or not. But I was very happy the way I bowled in the first match”Chahal on his concerns during the lockdown

He often referred to “big heart” while talking of Chahal, a striking feature of the wiry bowler who has in many ways been programmed to tailor himself to the shorter boundaries at the M Chinnaswamy Stadium. He tosses the ball up again and again with a “no fear” attitude. After all, he has been conditioned all these years to not worry about being hit for sixes. Wherever else he bowls, it naturally “feels like heaven”.This “flighting the ball” generously allows him to disguise the googly well. Unlike Anil Kumble’s or Rashid Khan’s, his is a lot slower through the air. And when the training resumed, Chahal was only focused on landing them at the same spot he lands his stock ball. In his first game of the season, against the Sunrisers Hyderabad, he waited until his third over to bowl one.

****

Jonny Bairstow is deceived in the flight as he swipes only to get beaten. Josh Philippe, the rookie Australian wicketkeeper, doesn’t read it off the pitch and misses it altogether. It goes away for four byes. Chahal grimaces before going back to his run-up with a wry smile. He knows he has won that contest but the match is still to be won. The Royal Challengers are on a sticky wicket having started poorly with the ball in defence of 162. Eventually, it’s Chahal only who gets Bairstow by messing with his mind and deceiving him in the air with a superb legbreak. All Bairstow can manage is an ugly hoick against the turn. He misses it completely and is bowled.Now as he gears up to bowl to Vijay Shankar, Kohli has a quick word with him. He lands the ball on the fourth stump. He gets it to dip on Shankar, who lunges forward to play what he believes is a legbreak. This one fizzes back in to beat the inside edge. Gone, first-ball duck. The game has been turned. The Sunrisers are in trouble. Chahal is back in full rhythm. The lengths, the wrong’uns don’t seem to be a worry anymore. His natural instincts have taken over.”When I got Vijay’s wicket, I think that was very important because it’s always a dream for a legspinner to bowl that delivery,” he says with a smile. “That gave me more confidence. Before that, I bowled it two-three times in the nets. I spoke to AB sir and even he told me he is not able to pick my googlies, so he told me ‘please use your googlies, but depending on the situation. Batsmen are not able to read you.'”Vijay Shankar loses his stumps to Yuzvendra Chahal•BCCISo when does he plan what delivery he’s going to bowl? If Chahal is to be believed, his mind is blank until he goes to his run-up, and firms up only as he runs in. Again depending on the match situation. If he’s bowling in the powerplay, he likes to mix them up. In the middle, he gives it good air and loves to bowl his googly, as he did against the Sunrisers, or the Kings XI Punjab when he dismissed Mayank Agarwal with a superb wrong’un. At the death, he likes to fire them wide, bowl sliders or tossed-up deliveries out of the hitting arc. This didn’t work in his final over – the 18th – against Kieron Pollard, though, in the game where the Mumbai Indians nearly chased down 90 in the final five overs. Anyone else would’ve been worried, not Chahal. Because he has the clarity of thought.”I think you should understand the situation very well,” he says, when asked about how he plans to unleash what kind of delivery. “In one over, you may want to flight [the ball] or you may want to go flatter. You should know which weapon [to use], which batsman you want to give singles to and who you want to attack. For me, I have three-four variations so, if you use them well, it becomes difficult for the batsman to judge.”Over the course of his time so far in the UAE, Chahal has made use of every practice session to learn new tricks. The funny man image that he portrays to the outside world is just one part of his persona. Behind all that, there’s a man behind nerdy spectacles who desires to be the best version he can possibly be. He came to the UAE in 2014 as a rookie wanting to prove himself. Six years on, he’s retention material, talked about as part of a core group. These days, he also mentors young players, leads team meetings and is happy to work on his game to get an edge.He’s been talking a lot to Adam Zampa, the Australian legspinner who has somewhat become a limited-overs specialist. “We chat all the time, at training and in the team room,” Chahal says. It was during one such conversation that Zampa asked Chahal if he’d ever considered bowling a quicker googly to the right-handers. It’s a suggestion Chahal took on board and has tried to work it out at the nets, bowling to Kohli and de Villiers.AB de Villiers has a chat with Yuzvendra Chahal•BCCI”We keep talking, not just at nets but also in the team room. We are together, we decided how we can bowl at grounds where one side has shorter boundaries,” Chahal explains. “So it becomes hard bowling stump-to-stump. I’m enjoying talking to him. I’ve learnt a couple of things with him, when we go to the nets, we discuss depending on how the wicket is. I watched him play for the Australian team. I’ve tried to bowl quicker googles in this IPL. It will give lesser chances for batsmen to hit sixes, and it’s easier to get them than out.”While learning and developing his game has been important, Chahal’s personality and easy-going attitude make him the go-to man for the young players in the squad. The Royal Challengers have consciously tried to veer away from their old habits – like having only the select 15 travel to match venue while the rest stay back at the hotel. They have tried to make the younger players open up at team meetings, karaoke nights and even at team dinners. One junior player is paired with a senior – and the two go about working together for the rest of the season. The primary reason is to get players to communicate better, and voice their thoughts without hesitation. This is a role Chahal is particularly enjoying.He has been working with Shahbaz Ahmed, who plays for Bengal in domestic cricket but hails from Haryana, Chahal’s home state. Ahmed is a tall left-arm spinner who has gained the reputation of being a consistent bowler in domestic cricket, apart from having the ability to hit big lower down the order. For Chahal, these small steps in mentorship have also helped him evolve as a cricketer and “take his game to the next level”.One of the first lessons from the Chahal’s rule book that he is trying to advocate his younger colleagues is to bowl without worrying about being hit. “You should always back your plans, no matter what,” he says. “Last match I went for some four overs, 45 or 48 something, but I was fine that because if it’s happening once in five-six matches then I’m fine with that. If it’s happening in three games out of six, then I’m doing something wrong. Then I’m not bowling well. I always back my strength and for me, I want to read batsman, what he’s thinking of my bowling. If he hits me for four or a boundary, then I’ll plan according to that.”The lessons, the mateship, the communication and vibe have all left Chahal dreaming of the possibilities of doing something special. “Our aim is to win the trophy and this year we have a more balanced side, especially in the bowling [department],” he says. “We’ve won two matches out of three and we are very positive. This year, not me, everyone’s saying… AB sir, Virat … there is some different feeling. We are getting that feeling after 2016. Something is there this year, one positive energy from all of the group, from the management side and we are very excited. For me, whether I’m playing or not playing, my goal is to win the trophy for RCB.”

How good are Anderson and Broad in India?

In Asia, they’re great. In India, sightly less so. Will they bring their best game this time around?

Alan Gardner02-Feb-2021Steve Waugh famously called it the “final frontier”, and you could certainly think of easier assignments. When you are a mid-to-late-30s English fast bowler, four-Test tours of India presumably rank high on your personal list of thankless tasks. Yet, as England’s prologue in Sri Lanka demonstrated, James Anderson and Stuart Broad remain (relatively) old dogs of the highest pedigree, and still capable of new tricks.Broad, in particular, would doubtless point out that he is only 34 and arguably in his prime – 38 Test wickets at 14.76 in 2020 giving him the most-potent calendar year of his career to date. And while it’s probably safe to say this will be Anderson’s fifth and final tour of India, well… just don’t do so within his earshot.The most-prolific pace portmanteau in Test history, Broaderson just keeps coming (even when England have tried to manage the decline) and two spotless individual outings in Galle raised the question of whether Joe Root ought to make room for both in his preferred XI to take on India. Chris Silverwood, the head coach, suggested it was “great just to have the options”, and there are various ways in which England’s allrounder jigsaw could allow for Anderson Broad to be picked.Related

Anderson doesn't expect reverse swing to play a part in day-night Test

What will it be like to take on Kohli and Co on their own patch?

First day, no show – Chennai braces itself for a closed-doors first Test

How often have James Anderson and Stuart Broad combined to bowl out the opposition?

The end of the Anderson overseas debate? It should be

But what are the prospects for success? Can England overcome a perceived weakness in the spin department by placing additional faith in their venerable seam-bowling pair – particularly if Chepauk sports a greenish tinge come match day? Time to boldly go and take a look at the numbers.Green seamers
The first thing to say is that, of the seam-bowling options available to Silverwood and Root, there is a huge gulf in experience between Anderson and Broad and the rest. That is true of most settings but particularly in Asia, where England’s next most-successful fast bowler is allrounder Ben Stokes, followed by another big gap to Mark Wood (who has been rested for the first two Tests). Jofra Archer will likely get his first taste of bowling in the subcontinent, because of the extra pace he can provide, while batting ability adds to the claims of Sam Curran (also rested for the Chennai Tests) and Chris Woakes.ESPNcricinfo LtdSecondly, while Broad has had the edge form-wise since a resurgent 2019 Ashes summer, it is Anderson who stands out for his impeccable record in this part of the world – never mind what the “Clouderson” critics might have you believe. His Galle six-for upped the ante once again, making him the oldest seamer in Test history to claim a five-wicket haul in Asia and adding to a remarkably robust catalogue of work.All-weather Anderson
An average of 29.10 seems steady, and puts him roughly mid-table among quicks to have taken 40 wickets in Asia since 1990. But narrow it down to bowlers from overseas and he’s in good company – not to mention above a host of those with local knowhow, such as Wahab Riaz, Ishant Sharma, Lasith Malinga and Zaheer Khan. No current seamer can compete with his miserly economy rate of 2.61.ESPNcricinfo LtdIn fact, since the turn of the millennium, only one fast bowler from outside the subcontinent has been more successful than Anderson – and as Andrew Fidel Fernando has previously established on these pages, very few in history can compete with Dale Steyn. Among quicks to have taken 40-plus wickets in that time, only Glenn McGrath and Shaun Pollock were more economical.ESPNcricinfo LtdDifferent spin
Anderson was, of course, described as “the major difference between the two sides” by MS Dhoni after the 2012-13 Tests – India’s last series defeat on home soil. It is perhaps the level of control he offers that makes Anderson England’s key seamer once again, a decade later. His recent injury record means he will need looking after – and may add weight to the idea that he and Broad should be rotated – but his reliability and enduring fitness levels, as well as the apparent flaws in England’s spin attack, mean he is just as likely to fulfil a holding role as to cut a swathe with the new ball; in the first innings in Galle last month, only Jack Leach delivered more than Anderson’s 29 overs.Looking specifically at his record in India, it is almost more instructive to draw a comparison with visiting spinners: Anderson’s average and economy compare well against the likes of Shane Warne, Daniel Vettori and Muttiah Muralitharan (albeit if he ends up with the same workload as Murali, there’s no doubting he will break).ESPNcricinfo LtdHe may be famed for expertly harnessing the swinging Dukes ball, but Anderson has some of a spinner’s guile, too. His success in 2012-13 included removing Sachin Tendulkar for the eighth and ninth time in Tests (no bowler did so more), and Tendulkar recently revealed his admiration for Anderson’s ability to bowl reverse swing – essentially taking the old ball away from a right-hander despite the wrist position indicating an inswinger. More recently, Anderson spoke of his enjoyment in Galle after removing Niroshan Dickwella with an offcutter that the batsman, on 92, miscued after being suffocated by a tight off-side field.Broad walks the talk
It was Broad, however, who got the nod at the start of England’s six-Test subcontinental odyssey, and figures of 26-14-34-3 on a classic Galle dustbowl suggested he has added a dimension to his game. That haul doubled his career wicket tally in Sri Lanka, from three previous visits, and took his returns in Asia to 44 at 36.31 – though most of his success has come on skiddier surfaces in the UAE. In India, his record to date is not pretty – ten wickets at 53.90 – but late-stage Broad has shown an unstinting appetite for honing his cutting edge.ESPNcricinfo LtdWhether it’s his reinvention as a tormentor of left-handers – just ask David Warner – or working on the legcutter that has become a significant part of his repertoire, Broad is comfortable going back to the drawing board. His ability to transcend the conditions in Galle drew praise from Angelo Mathews, and Broad also went into some of the subtleties of his approach. “I concentrated on making the batsman play as much as possible, and also varying my pace in little ways. Maybe not 6-7mph at times but going up two miles an hour, coming down three or four miles an hour, and that was the plan I stuck to.”Similar plans for Chennai and Ahmedabad are doubtless already in the works. If England are to frustrate India’s strokemakers – players such as Rohit Sharma, Shubman Gill and Rishabh Pant, who score a high percentage of their runs in boundaries – then it is likely Anderson and/or Broad will have to set the tone. Even so, frontier life may prove inhospitable. In 2016-17, England’s two senior seamers each played three Tests out of five, but could do little to avert a 4-0 defeat.Beating a Sri Lanka team low on confidence is one thing, competing with India on their own terms quite another. You don’t need to have been around the block to know that.

LPL 2020 ready for take-off – powered by stars, riding the crest of chaos

Mathews, Mendis, Perera among local talent; Steyn, Russell, Amir lend overseas glamour in five-team T20 tournament

Andrew Fidel Fernando24-Nov-2020You’re not dreaming. This is not a fantasy. After years of announcements and cancellations, years in which Sri Lanka Cricket (SLC) officials lumbered into organisational walls and stumbled into logistical potholes, Sri Lanka fans will finally get to watch a homegrown franchise T20 league. The build-up has been chaotic. Players have pulled out late, others have contracted Covid-19, replacements have been hastily found, payments have been demanded, quarantines completed and a flight has even been missed. It’s been an anarchic whirlwind, but in a way, there is no better precursor to cricket in Sri Lanka. It’s less than 48 hours until the first game begins. So here, have a preview.

Colombo Kings

Coach: Herschelle GibbsCaptain: Angelo MathewsHow good are they looking? (With the caveat that as most Sri Lanka players have not had high-level competitive cricket since March, form is going to be almost impossible to judge.)For starters, Colombo Kings have the two biggest names in the tournament, and from the looks of it, were the biggest spenders. Andre Russell’s presence gives the whole league a sheen of desperately needed glamour, while they also have Mathews, who is the most recognisable Sri Lankan player following the exit of Lasith Malinga. But these are not just names. If both Russell and Mathews are available to bowl, the Kings give themselves versatility with the ball, as well as solid firepower through the middle order, which could be the makings of a fine T20 side.There’s also a strong spin department. Afghan legspinner Qais Ahmad, and local spinners Tharindu Kaushal (offspin), Amila Aponso, and Jeffrey Vandersay each have varying strengths. The top order will likely feature Daniel Bell-Drummond, who topped the run-scorers’ list in England’s T20 Blast tournament this year, where Laurie Evans racked up impressive numbers from the middle order.This is not to say there are no serious challenges. Dinesh Chandimal, who will almost certainly keep wickets, hasn’t been a top T20 performer in years, and despite the presence of Isuru Udana and Dushmantha Chameera, the seam-bowling contingent seems a little shaky. But, this is a solid outfit.Notable mishap (LPL should find sponsors for tournament gaffes): Dav Whatmore was originally slated to coach this team. He was then replaced (for reasons not known) by Kabir Ali. Kabir, though, tested positive for Covid-19 in England last week, and couldn’t make the trip across. So Gibbs, who was flying across to Sri Lanka to work as a commentator for the tournament, was nominated as coach, and was informed of this on his arrival.Shahid Afridi will have to undergo a three-day isolated quarantine once he gets to Sri Lanka•Pakistan Super League

Galle Gladiators

Coach: Moin KhanCaptain: Uhh…maybe Bhanuka Rajapaksa for now? But Shahid Afridi when he gets to Sri Lanka…that’s unless he misses another flight.How good are they looking?If Malinga had turned up relatively fit and firing, Gladiators might have reasonably claimed to have the best attack of the tournament. Now, with Malinga having pulled out last moment, Gladiators will hope Mohammad Amir has a great tournament, with Asitha Fernando also likely to be a key fast bowler.On paper, Gladiators have Sri Lanka’s best spinners, with Lakshan Sandakan and Akila Dananjaya both in the squad, but there is a little asterisk here. Dananjaya’s just coming back from a one-year ban, which he copped due to an illegal action. He is understood to have brought his elbow up to code during that layoff, but how effective will the new action be?Batting-wise, Danushka Gunathilaka and Hazratullah Zazai seem an imposing pairing at the top of the order, with Rajapaksa, Shehan Jayasuriya and Ahsan Ali also around. What might worry Gladiators is that they are light on seam-bowling all-round options. The middle order seems shaky as well, unless Afridi has a stellar tournament.Notable mishap: Sarfaraz Ahmed was originally supposed to be the captain of this team, just as he captains the PSL’s Quetta Gladiators – the team owner’s other team. But then he went and got himself picked for Pakistan’s tour to New Zealand. The captaincy subsequently went to Malinga, who clearly took the responsibility quite seriously and waited for the week before the tournament to announce that he wouldn’t be playing. Afridi then inherited this chalice, and promptly missed a flight to Sri Lanka.Niroshan Dickwella goes for a scoop•AFP

Dambulla Viikings

(Yes, Viikings with two ‘i’s. It’s the brand name of the business that owns the franchise.)Captain: They promise they will let us know when they decide.Coach: Owais ShahHow good are they looking?There is a decent locally nurtured batting order here. Niroshan Dickwella, Upul Tharanga and Oshada Fernando are likely to take up residence in the top four, and will most likely be joined by the biggest foreign name in Viikings’ ranks – Ireland opener Paul Stirling. For middle-order firepower, they’ve got Dasun Shanaka, Angelo Perera (a long-time domestic performer), Ramesh Mendis (a rising star in the domestic scene), and Afghanistan’s Samiullah Shinwari.Lahiru Kumara, who may be the quickest bowler in the tournament, headlines the attack, with Kasun Rajitha, Aftab Alam, and Sudeep Tyagi, the former India pacer who retired from all forms of cricket last week, for company. On the spin front, Samit Patel arrives fresh from a PSL runners-up stint with the Lahore Qalandars, while domestic stalwart left-arm spinner Malinda Pushpakumara is also on board.On the surface, Viikings don’t look the most promising team in the tournament partly because they seem light on superstar talent, and there aren’t a lot of consistent T20 performers here either. But if their local batsmen fire, there is no reason they couldn’t put up a strong campaign.Notable mishap: Initially, when coach Jon Lewis drafted the majority of this team, they were known as the Dambulla Hawks. Then, a couple of weeks later, after Lewis had been jettisoned, they became the Dambulla Lions for a bit. Eventually, the Viikings group (who own a brewery in Goa, plus a bunch of other stuff probably), bought the franchise, and slapped their brand name on the team.Dale Steyn takes a photo with young fans•Getty Images

Kandy Tuskers

Captain: Kusal PereraCoach: Hashan TillakaratneHow good are they looking?Tuskers have perhaps had the rockiest road into the tournament, having hit a serious speed bump last week when Chris Gayle withdrew, citing injuries. It had been hoped that between Gayle and captain Kusal Perera Tuskers could produce some serious top-order ballistics, but they will now have to do with the more staid kinds of innings that Brendan Taylor tends to produce. Rahmanullah Gurbaz (Afghanistan), Kusal Mendis and Asela Gunaratne are also likely to bat in the top six.The team did get a late boost, when Dale Steyn was announced as a replacement for Sohail Tanvir, but beyond this there’s not a lot of bankable talent, and Steyn will probably miss the first week in any case. It’s been two years since Tuskers’ Indian seamers – Irfan Pathan and Munaf Patel – last played a T20 game. Fast bowler Nuwan Pradeep has been known to deliver good death-bowling performances, but the remainder of the prominent local bowlers – Vishwa Fernando, Dilruwan Perera, and Lasith Embuldeniya – have made their names as Test bowlers.Notable mishap: Initially, Tuskers had picked Wahab Riaz and Liam Plunkett to lead their attack, before Wahab got picked for Pakistan’s tour of New Zealand, and Plunkett pulled out citing injury. Then they chose Tanvir to beef up their pace stocks, but Tanvir tested positive for Covid-19 soon after arriving in Sri Lanka, and now has to be sequestered away in a separate hotel until he gets better.Thisara Perera goes on the front foot to drive on the up•Getty Images

Jaffna Stallions

Captain: Thisara PereraCoach: Thilina KandambyHow good are they looking?Jaffna Stallions’ strategy in the draft was obvious: to select a core of dynamic local players, around which to build the franchise. They were so committed to this strategy that two of their three marquee players were locals (Thisara Perera and Wanindu Hasaranga), when most teams opted to pick just one local marquee player. The result is a dangerous outfit. In addition to Hasaranga and Thisara, who can contribute with both bat and ball, Stallions also have Dhananjaya de Silva, and Chaturanga de Silva. Avishka Fernando, the most exciting top-order talent in Sri Lanka, and promising wicketkeeper-batsman Minod Bhanuka are in the squad as well.Kyle Abbott, the former South Africa fast bowler, is the most notable name among the foreign players, with Usman Shinwari – the left-arm quick from Pakistan – and Duanne Olivier – Abbott’s fellow Kolpak-deal maker also around. West Indies’ Johnson Charles will probably open the innings, and Stallions have the experience of Shoaib Malik to call on in the middle order.There are no notable specialist spinners here, though. Stallions are banking on Hasaranga and Dhananjaya de Silva having good tournaments with the ball.Stallions were also the only team to run a training camp for their local players long before the foreigners began showing up. In general, they seem the most organised of the franchises so far.Notable mishap: Stallions have avoided the worst of the upheaval that has characterised the lead-up to the tournament. But they did have one late withdrawal: Ravi Bopara pulled out after the franchise could not agree to providing him his full payment up front.

All sights on September for Tom Westley as Essex begin twin title defence

Bob Willis Trophy and County Championship already in possession, and a new responsibility looming

Alan Gardner30-Mar-2021It is natural for any county cricketer scanning ahead on the fixture list at the start of summer to make note of a Lord’s final – all the more so if you are the captain of the defending Bob Willis Trophy champions. Essex know their way around the business end of the season and will hope to still be in the mix come September 25, though team success could leave Tom Westley juggling more than just matters of form and selection, with his wife, Rosie, due to give birth to their first child the day before.”It’s going to be touch and go,” he admits, though for now Westley is happy to park thoughts of fatherhood and focus on the rather more familiar challenge of leading Essex in their defence of not one, but two first-class titles, given the resumption of the County Championship after it was forced into abeyance by Covid-19 last year.In its absence, Essex lifted the inaugural BWT in late September after a truncated county season, adding to the Championship triumphs of 2017 and 2019, and meaning they will go into this summer’s restructured competition – in which a conference system will eventually lead to the Division One winners taking the pennant before contesting “the Bob” against the team that comes second – as the team to beat twice over.These are “exciting times, new times”, Westley tells ESPNcricinfo. “The first time a county has had to defend two red-ball trophies. But that’s testament to Essex last year, the preparation wasn’t spot on because of what happened with the pandemic. Winning the Bob Willis showed how strong we are, how much depth we have and how resilient we can be in testing times. So we’re going to have to show that again this year defending two trophies, and wanting to compete and win the T20 again, and the 50-over comp. We set out to win every game we play, so I can’t see that changing.”Related

Will Young to join Durham for early Championship games

From escaping the 2004 Sri Lanka tsunami to setting sights on England

Bug problem prompts venue switch for Sussex-Lancashire opener

The pandemic is, of course, still an unavoidable fact of life, and Essex were among the last counties to return to training at the end of February, as the club took a cautious approach to the safety of players and staff. Understandably, Westley and his team-mates are “buzzing” just to have the opportunity to get back out on the field.”It’s been quite a challenging winter, I think the final lockdown really did deplete everyone,” he says. “As cricketers we’re just desperate to get back and try to regain some form of normality, but that wasn’t to be at Essex particularly. I think we were the only county that weren’t training at one stage, which was tough.”[But] Essex have traditionally always been good at making the best of a bad situation. We’ve shown that in games where we’ve started poorly and managed to bounce back strong and go on to win. That’s similar to our preparation, it hasn’t always been ideal but we’ve been able to get some top-quality work in with the time available.”This will be Westley’s second season as captain, having succeeded Ryan ten Doeschate last year. Given his impending life event, an eagerness to embrace the role and pour his efforts into helping the team should stand him in good stead when it comes to adding parenthood to his list of responsibilities.”I think the captaincy came at a nice time, because there is an emphasis placed on what I can do, what I can give to other people,” he says. “It’s not all about individual performances, even though I want to score the most runs and score hundreds. There is a more holistic approach to my cricket now, the wellbeing of the other players, the decision-making and inputs from them is massive, and I want them to be as successful as they possibly can.Alastair Cook is one of the elder statesmen on whom Tom Westley can lean as captain•Getty Images”I take a lot of pleasure in the fact it’s not just about myself any more, I have to think about the others. I want to be as good to those younger guys as Tendo was to myself and others during these last three-four years. I’ve been at Essex my whole career and I think we’re a fantastic cricket club. I think we play cricket the right way, I think we have fun, I think we’re entertaining, and there’s a lot of history at our club. It would be amazing to be a part of that and put your own stamp on it, so you can look back and think we were part of something special.”The strength of Essex’s team spirit, built around a strong core of homegrown players supplemented by high-quality additions like ten Doeschate and Simon Harmer, has been a feature of their rise in recent seasons – from Division Two winners in 2016, to sustained red-ball success and a maiden T20 title in 2019.There is, as Westley says, “very big family feel to the club”, with former captains Keith Fletcher, Graham Gooch and Ronnie Irani all still involved at Chelmsford and rooting for further triumphs. The current squad is strong and settled, with nine of the players who contested the Championship decider at Taunton in 2019 likely to be involved against Worcestershire next week, and arguably a match for any in the club’s history – although they are still a few pots shy of the 12 won under Fletcher and then Gooch between 1979 and 1992.”We are quite mindful about wanting to create a bit of a legacy, we want to be part of a very special era – like Essex have had in the past, the Fletcher era, the Gooch era,” Westley says. “It’s common knowledge as an Essex player that you hear about those times, a kind of golden period for the club. I saw Fletch this week and I was quizzing him on how many Championships he’d won, and statistics aren’t his strongest suit – he told me he’d won eight Championships and that’s definitely a lie, because I think Essex have only won about eight in their history.”I said to him, I can’t wait to hopefully win a couple more and win more than yourself Fletch, and he said: ‘Nothing would please me more than for you guys to carry on winning’. You do want to create a bit of a dynasty, your own legacy as a group of players. Because in the first half of my career at Essex we didn’t win anything.”The same can’t be said of recent years. And the Westley era has only just begun.

Was Fakhar Zaman's 193 the highest score by a batsman in a losing cause in an ODI?

Also: was Harshal Patel the first to take a five-for against the Mumbai Indians?

Steven Lynch13-Apr-2021Was Fakhar Zaman’s 193 the highest score by a batsman in a losing cause in a one-day international? asked Navjot Bhatia from India

Fakhar Zaman’s remarkable solo innings of 193 against South Africa in Johannesburg last week (the nexthighest was Babar Azam’s 31) just missed out on this distinction. The bespectacled Zimbabwe batsman Charles Coventry clattered 194 not out against Bangladesh in Bulawayo in August 2009, but his side ended up losing by four wickets. In all, there have been 18 innings of 150 or more in a losing cause in ODIs.Zaman’s onslaught did set a different record, though: it was the highest score for the side batting second in an ODI, beating Shane Watson’s 185 not out for Australia against Bangladesh in Mirpur in April 2011.Was Harshal Patel the first player to take a five-for against the Mumbai Indians in the IPL? And who had the previous best figures against them? asked Lakshmi Narayanan from India

The Haryana seamer Harshal Patel’s 5 for 27 for the Royal Challengers Bangalore in the opening match of the 2021 IPL, in Chennai last week, did indeed make him the first to take five in an innings against five-time champions the Mumbai Indians. The previous best against them was 4 for 6 by Rohit Sharma – now Mumbai’s captain, but then with the Deccan Chargers – in Centurion in 2009. Eight seasons later, Samuel Badree took 4 for 9 against them for RCB in Bengaluru.Patel’s haul was the 22nd five-for in the IPL: the best figures in the competition remain 6 for 12, by Alzarri Joseph – in his first match – for the Mumbai Indians against the Sunrisers in Hyderabad in April 2019.Darren Stevens scored a century in Kent’s first match of the season, aged 44 – who’s the oldest to score a hundred in the Championship? asked Michael Caldwell from England

In making 116 not out for Kent at Northampton last week, Darren Stevens – who turns 45 on April 30 – became the oldest man to make a hundred in the County Championship since 45-year-old Chris Balderstone, for Leicestershire against Sussex at Grace Road in July 1986. The previous day, Geoff Boycott, who was about a month older than Balderstone, had made his final Championship hundred for Yorkshire.But they are all a fair way behind the oldest County Championship centurion. It’s WG – but probably not the one you immediately think of. WG Grace hit his final first-class hundred (in a non-Championship game for London County vs MCC at Crystal Palace) the day after his 56th birthday in 1904 – but WG “Willie” Quaife was 139 days older when he made 115 for Warwickshire against Derbyshire at Edgbaston in 1928.Forty-four-year-old Darren Stevens made an unbeaten century for Kent, but he’s a long way from being the oldest player to score a hundred in the County Championship•Getty ImagesAccording to his player page, Hansie Cronje also played for Ireland – when was this? asked Zaheer Gill from the United States

The former South African captain Hansie Cronje played three matches for Ireland in 1997, as their permitted overseas player during the Benson and Hedges Cup, an English domestic competition. Cronje scored 94 not out in a victory over Middlesex in Dublin, and added 1 against Somerset in Taunton and 85 against Glamorgan in Cardiff. Cronje was not the only notable overseas player to feature for Ireland: the Waugh twins, Shahid Afridi, Saqlain Mushtaq, Jesse Ryder and Jonty Rhodes are among those who also made a few appearances for them.Who was the first Test player born in Afghanistan? asked Jamal Khan from Kabul

It’s usually said (and shown online) that the mercurial Indian allrounder Salim Durani, who collected 75 wickets and more than 1200 runs in his 29 Tests, was born in Kabul in 1934. But it might not be as simple as that, as Gulu Ezekiel explains in his entertaining new book Myth-Busting: “Salim has stated that he was born ‘under the open skies’ when his mother went into labour and gave birth while they were travelling in a camel caravan from Karachi to Kabul in the region of the Khyber Pass.” So we will probably never know – he might have been born in Afghanistan, if the camels had made it across the border from what was then undivided India. But if they were still the other side of the line, then the first Afghan-born Test cricketers were the XI who took the field for their inaugural match, against India in Bengaluru in June 2018. Ironically, Durani was invited to that match as a guest of honour thanks to the legend of his Kabul birthplace!Use our feedback form, or the Ask Steven Facebook page to ask your stats and trivia questions

What looking at James Anderson's and Ishant Sharma's careers as collections of spells tells us about them as bowlers

There’s a fair bit to be learned by looking at these bowlers in terms of the support (or lack of it) at the other end

Kartikeya Date30-Mar-2021Batting partnerships are recorded as a matter of course in cricket scorecards. What about the bowling equivalent?Using ball-by-ball records, which are now available for 887 Test matches, from 1999 to 2021, I have constructed spells records for each bowler, along the lines of batting partnership records. For example, if a bowler bowls a five-over spell starting in over 49 of a Test innings and ending in over 57 (overs 49, 51, 53, 55 and 57), then the overs at the other end during this spell are 50, 52, 54 and 56. The record for each spell includes the runs conceded and wickets taken by the bowler during the spell, and the runs conceded and wickets taken at the other end during the spell.The overall picture presented by the spells record is as one might expect in Test cricket. When wickets fall at one end, they are also likely to fall at the other. The table below shows the overall record of spells organised by the number of wickets that fell at the other end during the spells. All told, three out of four spells are bowled without a single wicket falling at the other end. Only a little over 6% of spells involve at least two wickets falling at the other end. When wickets are falling at the other end, bowlers do better than when they aren’t.Kartikeya DateThe record is sufficiently large now to include the full careers of players like James Anderson, Dale Steyn and R Ashwin (but not those of players like Glenn McGrath, Shane Warne and Harbhajan Singh). In the rest of this article, the possibilities of the spells data set are illustrated using the example of Anderson. Ishant Sharma’s record is used as a short second example.Related

James Anderson – ageless, and a champion in home conditions

Ishant Sharma – from unlucky workhorse to master quick

Unlike limited-overs cricket, which is a contest of efficiency, Test cricket is a game of control. The absence of a predetermined limit on the length of an innings over which the ten available wickets are to be taken means that batsmen seek to accumulate runs as safely as possible. Bowlers are the masters of the contest. If a bowler does not bowl a bad ball, and bowls according to the set field, the batsman is unlikely to score freely. Test cricket is a contest of control because it is the bowler’s accuracy that shapes possibilities.Consider the spells record for Anderson. This is presented as a rolling record of 150 chronologically consecutive spells. The first graph below gives a comparison of Anderson’s bowling average over each 150-spell period compared to the bowling average achieved at the other end during these 150 spells. The labels on the horizontal axis give the end dates of each of the 150-spell periods.Kartikeya DateThe record suggests that Anderson’s career can be organised into four periods. In his early years, he was not the best bowler in the England side. His wickets were initially more expensive than those taken at the other end, and this meant that he did not hold a regular spot in England’s XI.He returned in 2006 and won his spot in the strong English attack that would win the Ashes in Australia in 2010-11, and win in India in 2012-13, reaching the top of the world rankings.A third phase of his career – perhaps the finest – began after Graeme Swann retired and that world No. 1 team broke up. Anderson carried the English attack, along with the mercurial Stuart Broad. His wickets came cheap and when he was bowling, England were at their attacking best. The support at the other end was sporadic, though, and this meant that other than in England, the team’s results were poor. They were hammered in Australia in 2013-14 and 2017-18 and in India in 2016-17.A fourth phase appears to have commenced in about the second half of 2018. The English attack has greater depth now, especially on the fast-bowling side of things, and support for Anderson has improved.A similar comparison of economy rates is given below. The economy rate in a Test match is an important aspect of control. This record adds texture to the four phases above, especially after the first phase, when Anderson was evidently either not sufficiently accurate or bowled the attacking length too often and went for runs.Kartikeya DateIn the second phase of his career, bowling in a strong all-round bowling attack that had both significant seam-bowling depth and quality spinners in Swann and Monty Panesar, Anderson could afford to be extremely attacking. He conceded about three runs per over. When that team broke up, the record suggests that Anderson changed his approach and decided to become more defensive and restrictive. In the fourth (and currently ongoing) phase of his great career, Anderson has mastered this restrictive style. He concedes less than 2.5 runs per over, while England concede runs at three an over at the other end.Anderson’s career trajectory is illustrated well by his record on his four Ashes tours so far. On his first, in 2006-07, he conceded 4.4 runs per over and took only five wickets at 82.6 apiece. On his second tour, in 2010-11, he conceded 2.9 runs per over and took 24 wickets at 26 apiece without taking a single five-wicket haul. This last suggests (much as it does with Pat Cummins’ 29 wickets in the 2019 Ashes in England without a single five-wicket haul), that Anderson bowled in a strong all-round attack. In 2013-14, he conceded 3.2 runs per over and took 14 wickets at 43.9 apiece. This was the tour on which England’s world No. 1 team broke apart. In 2017-18, Anderson conceded 2.1 runs per over, and took 17 wickets at 28.This restrictiveness alongside slightly lesser wicket-taking potency has become a feature of his bowling, especially away from home in this latest phase of his career. In Australia, India, West Indies and Sri Lanka – where the conditions are not traditionally conducive to Anderson’s brand of medium-fast seam and swing bowling – his last 14 Tests have brought him 42 wickets at 23.7 apiece. That’s only three wickets per Test, so while the wickets have been cheap, he has not been a significant wicket-taking threat. But he has been extremely difficult to score off – 2.16 runs per over. That kind of control is a captain’s dream.The spells record provides further insight into these four phases of Anderson’s career. The table below shows these four roughly defined phases as more or less equal numbers of matches, deliveries and wickets. The spells in each phase are classified into two groups. The first includes all spells by Anderson where no wickets fell from the other end. The second includes all spells by Anderson where at least one wicket fell from the other end.Kartikeya DateAs one would expect, Anderson has typically had better returns when wickets have been falling at the other end (the 2016-21 period is marginally an exception). This is, as the first table in this article shows, generally true for the average bowler in Test cricket. One can imagine why this is – the fact that wickets are falling from the other end suggests that the conditions are probably more bowler-friendly, or that the lower order is in, or both.Apart from that second phase, Anderson has bowled about two-thirds of his spells when no wickets have fallen at the other end. His returns from these spells show just how far he has come as a Test match bowler. He began as a highly gifted seam and swing bowler with a natural outswinger and a superb, simple, repeatable cartwheel action. When there was little help from the wicket (as evident from the fact that no wickets were falling at the other end), he was unable to exert control in that first phase. In the second phase of his career, Anderson benefited greatly from bowling in a strong attack. It is the only phase in which the majority of his wickets came in spells where at least one wicket also fell at the other end.Today, Anderson is a true maestro. He is able to control the scoring regardless of the conditions, and regardless of what’s happening at the other end. In part, this could be because opponents have decided to see him off. But it is far more likely that opponents would concede wickets to Anderson if they tried to take liberties against him. In other words, it is far more likely that batsmen are compelled to see him off.Reviewing Ishant Sharma’s career in this way offers revealing insights. If we organise his 101 Tests into three roughly equal phases, then his slump in the middle phase is one of more intriguing such troughs in modern Test history. If he had that type of slump after 30-odd Tests today, he would almost certainly lose his spot in the Test team, given the fast-bowling options available to India today. The third phase shows the colossal extent to which his returns have improved.Kartikeya DateWhy might this be? In part, this is probably because the Indian attack Sharma bowls in today is better than it used to be. In part, this is probably also because there are probably fewer featherbeds today than there used to be.The BCCI publishes scorecards on its website, and wherever available, they publish ball-tracking data under the Hawk-Eye tab. A review of this data (which is not available for Sharma’s full career, but is available for about 7800 deliveries of it, since 2011) shows that in the period until 2016, his average length was 7.4m from the batsman’s stumps. Since 2016, his average length is 7m. The same record, which is also not exhaustive for Anderson, shows Anderson’s average length (over roughly 13,800 deliveries for which the record is available) during this period to be 7.1m. Bowling a fuller length on average seems to mean that Sharma can attack the stumps more often than he used to, and is consequently more lethal.Like Anderson, Sharma is able to make his own weather in the Test match arena. His record is not a barometer for how helpful the conditions might be. He commands the batsman’s attention, and as is the case with Anderson, even that is often not enough for the batsman to survive.The spells data set produces a picture of the Test match game from the bowler’s point of view. This view is much neglected in the game, and the spells dataset should become a regular feature of the scorecard, in the same way that batting partnerships are. It provides a texture in the landscape of the Test match game that is otherwise difficult to observe.

Australia's best are back, but will it be enough for a title tilt?

These are the players that took the side to No. 1 in 2020 but the balance of the XI remains uncertain

Alex Malcolm19-Aug-2021Winning form is good form, and Australia has no form to speak of ahead of the T20 World Cup.However, the return of their best and most experienced players for the tournament has given the team hierarchy some confidence within the four walls of hotel quarantine, despite the noise outside surrounding tension between the coach Justin Langer and the players.The presence of David Warner, Steven Smith, Glenn Maxwell, Marcus Stoinis and Kane Richardson gives the squad a familiar feel to the one that won nine of 11 matches and four consecutive series in 2019-20, just prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. Australia were ranked No.1 in the ICC T20I rankings in May 2020 for the first time in history. Since then they have lost five consecutive T20I series and won just six of 21 matches, a record that has heaped enormous pressure on the coach.But Warner and Cummins haven’t played a T20I since September 2020, missing four of those series. Smith has been absent for the last 15 matches, while Maxwell, Stoinis and Richardson have missed the last 10. Aaron Finch played with an injury in the Caribbean against West Indies and missed the entire Bangladesh series.The recent results raise a broader question about Australian cricket that runs beyond the current coach. It shows Australia’s lack of T20 depth compared to India and England’s almost unlimited supply of high-quality T20 players and puts the BBL firmly into focus in terms of the league’s inability to produce readymade international players with the gap between T20I and BBL cricket seemingly as wide as ever.Related

  • Warner locked in to open for Australia at T20 World Cup

  • Carlos Brathwaite sees opportunity for wider use of some Hundred rules

  • After week of stress, Australia might only have papered over the cracks

  • Australian players get the go-ahead for IPL 2021 return

  • Men's T20 World Cup: India vs Pakistan in Dubai on October 24

Josh Inglis has been jettisoned into the 15-man squad ahead of Alex Carey and Josh Philippe as the back-up wicketkeeper and spare batter, on the back of his stellar middle order form in the BBL and T20 Blast dominance, after the other two failed to take their opportunities. Carey in some ways has been a victim of the team’s success during 2019-20. He played six consecutive games without batting during Australia’s winning run. Then his form dipped as the team’s dipped, Matthew Wade usurped him in the T20I side and now Inglis has taken his spot as the reserve wicketkeeper. Carey has been unable to translate his excellent ODI form, and strong BBL numbers, into T20I success.It is a strong squad, but there are still some tactical hurdles to overcome if this team is to challenge in the UAE, as no Australia men’s side has made a T20 World Cup semi-final since 2012, and each issue feeds into another.Steve Smith, Mitchell Starc, David Warner and Glenn Maxwell are all key to Australia’s chances•Alex Davidson/Getty ImagesFive bowlers vs seven battersAustralia have preferred to play five specialist bowlers in their first-choice side, a legacy of Langer’s success with Perth Scorchers where he won three titles. They had great success with this structure in nine games in Australia and South Africa in 2019-20 but the UAE conditions may not be as conducive to that make-up.The debate is nuanced. The difference between the four overs from the fifth specialist bowler and the four overs between Maxwell, Mitchell Marsh and Stoinis must be of greater value than what a seven-player batting line-up can muster versus a six-player line-up. Australia are clearly vulnerable with just six specialist batters. Ashton Agar has been batting far too high at No. 7 and should probably slide to No. 8 at least behind Pat Cummins. National selector George Bailey referenced Cummins’ power-hitting form in the last two editions of the IPL, where he has made his two T20 fifties, when the squad was announced.But even No. 7 for Cummins with Agar or Mitchell Starc at No. 8 is a gamble. The other major issue with six batters is it places even more pressure on the top order and does not allow them to play with as much aggression and freedom in the knowledge there is depth to follow. The structure of Australia’s line-up has a huge flow-on effect to all parts of the team.Collapses, a lack of middle-order specialists and death hittersBalancing batting freedom and responsibility has been one of Australia’s biggest issues even at full strength. Australia have botched chases from winning positions throughout the last 18 months. In Port Elizabeth in 2020 they needed 35 from 28 balls with eight wickets in hand and lost while just six down. In Southampton just six months later they needed 39 off 39 with nine wickets in hand and lost again.Both times Australia had six batters with Agar at No. 7. Warner made half-centuries in both innings but struck at 119 and 123 respectively with the lack of batting depth clearly a factor in the way he approached each innings. Australia’s middle-order problems are also a contributor having been well-known and well-documented, particularly against spin.Maxwell is the only true middle-order specialist in the squad and carries a huge burden. Marsh’s recent form at No. 3 has created more problems than it has solved. He has a far greater overall T20 record at No. 5. Stoinis has developed well in the role at No. 5 and 6 under the tutelage of Ricky Ponting at Delhi Capitals in the IPL, a point noted by Bailey.ESPNcricinfo LtdAustralia have opted not to pick a specialist death-hitter/bowling allrounder in the squad with Dan Christian and Daniel Sams named as reserves. If they play five specialist bowlers then one of Stoinis or Marsh doesn’t play. Their best opening combination is unequivocally Warner and Finch. That means the wicketkeeper, Smith, and Marsh or Stoinis must be flexible to bat anywhere depending on the situation.Bailey confirmed that Wade remains the first-choice wicketkeeper. His strength is his power and explosiveness at the top of the order and his career numbers indicate his highest value is opening. His record in the middle order is relatively mediocre but Australia have been preparing him for a middle-order role as he and Warner are the only left-handers among the specialist batters.If Inglis plays in Wade’s place, Australia have five or six consecutive right handers giving legspinners like Adil Rashid (England) and Hayden Walsh (West Indies) and left-arm orthodox Fabian Allen (West Indies) the chance to wreak havoc as they have done previously. Smith and Inglis are Australia’s best players of spin, but they don’t have the step-hit power that could be important in a tournament in the UAE.Death bowlingCan Kane Richardson get into the starting XI?•Getty ImagesAustralia’s new-ball bowling is their strength with Starc, Cummins and Josh Hazlewood at their disposal. They also have a good spin combination in Agar and Adam Zampa. But they only have one death and variation specialist in Kane Richardson. Variations will be important in this tournament particularly if the surfaces in Abu Dhabi are slow.The issue will be if Australia opt for a four-man attack to bolster the batting, then two of four quicks miss out, or they only play one specialist spinner. In both scenarios the other overs fall to Maxwell, Stoinis and Marsh. However, it will be hard to play just one specialist spinner in the UAE which means if they pick just two quicks, they could be vulnerable at the death as Richardson would likely be the one to miss out.Cummins and Hazlewood aren’t known for their variations although Hazlewood, who has only played 17 T20Is, used the conditions in Bangladesh to work on his cutters and slower balls with good effectiveness. As shown in the 2016 T20 World Cup final with Carlos Brathwaite, and Mumbai’s IPL victory in the UAE last year with Kieron Pollard and Hardik Pandya, attacks must curtail death hitters to win tournaments. Starc was able to do it against Andre Russell in the recent Caribbean series but his value up front means a juggling act to save enough overs at the death to do it on his own if the attack is four bowlers without Richardson.

Stats – Can England bury the ghosts of their last two Australia tours?

England have lost nine of their last 10 Tests in Australia, but with Root in form and a promising pace attack, they will hope to change the narrative

S Rajesh06-Dec-2021Since their 3-1 series triumph in Australia in 2010-11, England have lost nine out of 10 Tests in the country, averaged 25 with the bat, and nearly 46 with the ball. That is the sort of recent history England will be up against over the next few weeks, as they try to regain the Ashes.

Australia have been battling problems of their own recently, and lost their last home series, against India. However, their overall win-loss record in the last 10 years is still an impressive 36-8, with 11 series wins out of 16; they have lost twice each to India and South Africa, and drew a series against New Zealand in 2011-12. In fact, South Africa and India have been the two teams which have competed strongly in Australia. South Africa have a 3-1 win-loss record and are the only overseas team to score more runs per wicket than they concede in Australia in this period, while India’s record is marred by their hopeless 4-0 drubbing in 2011-12.Smith, Warner vs Anderson, BroadJames Anderson will play his fifth Test series in Australia, and Stuart Broad his fourth. How they go against Australia’s line-up in their home conditions could be a key component of which way the series pans out. Of particular interest will be their battles against Steven Smith and David Warner, the two giants of Australia’s batting.Broad was dominant against Warner in the 2019 Ashes series in England, dismissing him seven times while conceding just 35 runs, an average of five runs per dismissal. However, the last time they played in Australia, Warner scored 73 off 175 deliveries from Broad without being dismissed.ESPNcricinfo Ltd

Overall, both Anderson and Broad have dominated Warner in England, but Warner averages more than 50 against each of them in home conditions. Smith’s numbers against them have a remarkable symmetry – his average against Anderson in England is his average against Broad in Australia, and vice-versa. In Australia, Anderson has had more success against him, though Smith still averages a healthy 45.2.Red-hot Root’s century missionJoe Root’s average in Australia is a modest 38 from nine Tests, but the last time he toured there – in 2017-18 – he did much better, averaging 47.25, and scoring five fifties from nine innings. A century eluded him, though, which means his highest score from 17 Test innings in Australia is 87. It is the only country where he has played at least 10 innings without a hundred. Australia will be happy if those stats still hold true at the end of this series.

However, Root and Test centuries have had a strong bonding in 2021 – he has scored six of them, which is twice his previous best in any calendar year. That suggests he should end his century drought in Australia this time around, and also lift his overall Test average in the country to beyond 40.Going by his numbers against Australia’s current bowlers, his biggest threat will be his opposite number, the newly appointed captain Pat Cummins. Cummins has had the better of Root both in England and Australia. Against Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Starc and Nathan Lyon, Root averages more than 45 in Australia.

However, apart from Root, England will also need the rest of the top order to score big runs. Among the batters who have played in Australia, only Dawid Malan averages over 40. Malan was impressive on the tour in 2017-18, scoring a century and three fifties in nine innings.

Australia’s pace advantageOn the last two tours, England’s fast bowlers have struggled in Australia: they have averaged 38.56 runs per wicket, compared to the home fast bowlers’ average of 25.73 in the period since November 2011. The only country where they have a poorer average in these 10 years is in India (41.85).

The Kookaburra hasn’t been a friend for England’s pace bowlers: Anderson (35.43) and Broad (37.17) both average over 35 here, while Chris Woakes’ 10 wickets have cost him 49.50 each. Ben Stokes has done better, averaging 32.80, but England will want more from their frontline fast bowlers this time around. They’ll hope that Mark Wood’s pace, and Ollie Robinson’s accuracy and ability to extract bounce, will change the narrative this time around.Spin problems in AustraliaIf England’s fast bowlers have underwhelming records in Australia, then the spinners have been an embarrassment in the last two series, taking 22 wickets in 10 Tests at an average of 87. Except for Scott Borthwick, who picked up 4 for 82 in the last Test of the 2013-14 series, no England spinner averages less than 80 in Australia during this period. That underlines the challenge before Jack Leach and Dom Bess – should they play – as England try to emulate their achievement of 2010-11.

West Indies crashed and burned in the 2021 World Cup. How do they turn their T20I fortunes around?

Their six-led approach has been in the firing line, but their selection was poor, and the bowling has not been up to scratch either

Matt Roller21-Jan-2022In five and a half years, West Indies’ men’s T20 team went from boom to bust.Carlos Brathwaite’s four sixes and Marlon Samuels’ shirtless celebrations felt like a distant memory, a pre-pandemic fever dream, when they crashed out of the 2021 World Cup in the Super 12s, with four defeats from five games and an unwanted blot on the legacy of their legendary generation of T20 players.Kieron Pollard, who retained the captaincy despite their early exit, suggested his side needed to “bin it and move on” after they were bowled out for 55 in their opening game against England. But subsequent defeats to South Africa, Sri Lanka and Australia – and a last-gasp win against a poor Bangladesh side – ensured that the inquest into their shortcomings would need to dig deeper.Related

Resilient Powell serves up lethal T20 cocktail to leave England feeling punch-drunk

End of an era as West Indies' greatest hits fall flat

Pollard: 'I have no intentions of not playing international cricket'

How many boundaries should a team attempt in an innings? (2020)

The six-hitting team (2019)

There were two key questions to address: how could a team containing so many short-form greats bow out in such ignominy? And how might they now go about putting things right in the 11 months between their debacle and the start of the first round of the 2022 World Cup in Australia?Six or bust is not always the best formula
From 2012 to 2016, West Indies won two World Cups, with a semi-final exit sandwiched in between. While they were a strong bowling side throughout, their defining quality was a revolutionary batting approach.Conventional cricketing wisdom highlighted the need to minimise the number of dot balls a team chewed up. West Indies recognised that the runs their power-hitters could score by focusing on hitting sixes far outweighed the marginal gains from running singles. “People say we don’t rotate our strike well,” Daren Sammy, their captain at the time, said before the 2016 final. “But first thing is, you have to stop us from hitting boundaries.”After their early exit in 2021, the narrative was that West Indies’ six-or-dot approach had been found out. “They’re playing a dated brand of T20 cricket,” Daren Ganga, who captained a Trinidad and Tobago side featuring Pollard, Lendl Simmons and Dwayne Bravo to the Stanford 20/20 title in 2008, said after West Indies’ defeat to Sri Lanka.”We had personnel that could do that [power-hitting] in 2016,” Samuel Badree, West Indies’ most economical bowler in the 2012 and 2016 campaigns, says. “Opposition teams weren’t quite ready for that and they didn’t plan for that back then. We caught a lot of teams by surprise. That worked in our favour, in addition to the smaller grounds and the conditions that were on offer.”When you fast-forward five years, teams were better prepared. We’ve seen other teams [England and Australia, for example] who have copied that style but they’ve added the elements of strike rotation and lower dot-ball percentage, while we were stuck in that same old mould from 2016. We are quite inflexible and have one style: hit or miss. That might win you one or two games, but you’re not going to win tournaments like that anymore.”West Indies hugely emphasised running singles in training ahead of the World Cup but it didn’t quite pay off•Indranil Mukherjee/AFP/Getty ImagesIn the run-up to last year’s World Cup, West Indies had the rare chance to play T20Is with the vast majority of their best players available. They had 17 home games between March and August – 14 of them in a six-week window – and while their final series against Pakistan was badly affected by weather, Cricket West Indies (CWI) was clearly prioritising World Cup preparations.Pollard emphasised certain areas of improvement. Before their series against South Africa in Grenada they held two net sessions in which the batters were encouraged to work on their “manoeuvring game… just rotating the ball”, and were penalised for hitting boundaries. The intention, Pollard said, was “to keep our strength our strength, and work on our weakness”. “For the last couple of months, everything was about ‘singles, singles, singles’,” Nicholas Pooran, West Indies’ vice-captain and most promising young batter, said before the World Cup.But data from the World Cup suggested the lessons had not been learned. About 2.6 balls West Indies faced every over were dots; from the Super 12s stage onwards, only Scotland and Namibia faced more. That figure was only a fraction higher than it had been in 2016, but their six-hitting frequency dropped sharply over the 2016 tournament. West Indies hit as many sixes as their opposition in all five Super 12s games, and more in three of them; they also faced more dots than their opponents in every game.Notably, their attacking intent had hardly changed: according to CricViz, West Indies played attacking shots to 56% of the balls they faced in 2016, compared to 57% five years later. The contrast in their results over the two World Cups does not mean that stacking a batting line-up with power-hitters has become a flawed strategy. Instead, it illustrates that it is a high-variance approach, and in a tournament as short as a World Cup, it can lead to extreme results.

Conditions in the UAE were a major factor. All four of West Indies’ defeats came in either Dubai or Abu Dhabi, where the boundaries were significantly longer than those they had encountered in India half a decade before. Back then, a 3-0 series defeat to Pakistan in the Emirates barely six months after their win in Kolkata had served to illustrate their tendency to struggle on slower pitches. While the involvement of many West Indians in the Abu Dhabi T10 should have helped them adjust to conditions, that tournament’s format does little to help with what Ganga calls “softer skills”.Ian Bishop, the broadcaster whose commentary will forever be associated with Brathwaite’s heroics in 2016, agrees that the change of venue from India to the UAE did not suit West Indies. “They have to evolve, they have to be versatile,” he says. “[At certain venues] it may not always be sixes, it may be fours. It may just be scoring off more deliveries.”Personnel was another key problem. West Indies opted to stick with the veterans who had brought them so much success, but the delay of a year to the tournament left some senior players clinging on. Chris Gayle, whose personality is ill suited to life in a Covid bubble, contributed 45 runs in five innings before his not-quite-retirement at 42. He started the tournament at No. 3, influenced by his success there in the IPL for Punjab Kings, but moved up to open the batting after two games. “That really threw the entire planning out the way,” Badree says. Lendl Simmons played the tournament’s worst innings, a 35-ball 16 against South Africa that left the finishers with too much to do.Lendl Simmons’ innings, and the subsequent inclusion of Roston Chase, who made his T20 international debut in the third game of a World Cup on the back of two solid CPL seasons, laid bare West Indies’ failure to identify a long-term replacement for Samuels, Player of the Match in the 2012 and 2016 finals and the glue that held their batting line-up together.No bang for buck: Chris Gayle made 45 runs at a strike rate of 91.83 in the 2021 World Cup•Gianluigi Guerica/AFP/Getty ImagesAnd yes, teams were better-prepared against West Indies’ batting line-up in 2021, making clear plans against their hitters and sticking to them. South Africa posted a fielder almost directly behind the umpire to counter Pollard’s strength down the ground, a tactic often used by MS Dhoni for Chennai Super Kings against Mumbai Indians. Pooran had shown his strength hitting with the spin in the IPL; in the World Cup, he faced only three balls of legspin.”Those analytics and match-ups evolved in that five-year period – where we didn’t have any T20 World Cups – to a large extent,” Bishop says. “It’s become a great part of the game now, and that’s another part of the game where the West Indies are going to have to get up to speed.”The warning signs had been there. The wider trend in T20 cricket away from yorkers and towards hard lengths had negated West Indies’ historic strength of hitting down the ground. Lockie Ferguson had exposed that by blasting them out with his pace at Eden Park just under a year before the 2021 tournament. Few players in the West Indies squad play the ramp or the reverse sweep regularly, making it relatively easy to plan against them.A batting line-up that looked ferocious on paper was feeble in practice. As Pollard made clear after last week’s ODI series defeat to Ireland: “We have a batting problem in the Caribbean at the moment.”And the bowling was not all that hot either
There was no doubt that West Indies’ batting cost them their first two games in the World Cup: no side has ever defended 55 in a full-length T20 international, and their 143 for 8 against South Africa was at least 15 runs short of par.Leggie Hayden Walsh Jr played nine of West Indies’ 17 games leading in to the World Cup, but he only played two matches in the tournament•Francois Nel/Getty ImagesBut their final two defeats, against Sri Lanka and Australia in Abu Dhabi, reflected the extent to which their bowling attack had declined: West Indies leaked 350 runs in 36.2 overs across the two games, taking only five wickets. In 2016, their bowling attack was strong enough to defend a par score more often than not; in 2021, the batters knew they needed to score significantly above par for the bowlers to have a chance of defending it.”That didn’t happen,” Badree says. “The expectation was that the batting would give the bowlers that sort of cushion. Maybe that put an additional burden on the batting – and we saw what happened with that throughout the tournament. At the moment, we don’t have those types of bowlers in this format who are wicket-takers, we have more defensive bowlers. That’s what won us those two titles: we had bowlers who could take wickets during the powerplay, through the middle and at the back end.”From the Super 12s stage onwards, no team took fewer wickets than West Indies’ 16; in 2016, by contrast, they were the tournament’s leading wicket-takers from the Super 10s onwards. Wickets in T20 cricket are more valuable the earlier they come in the innings, but West Indies managed only six in the powerplay across their five matches in 2021 – three of them against an England team batting ultra-aggressively, looking for a net-run-rate boost in pursuit of 56.Mahela Jayawardene, the Mumbai Indians coach who has worked extensively with Pollard, highlighted the lack of a genuine fast bowler and of either a mystery spinner or a wristspinner in the squad, but selection and availability were significant problems. Sunil Narine’s two-year absence from international cricket extended into the World Cup; fitness was cited as the reason for his absence, though there was talk he was not confident about his action passing un-scrutinised. Obed McCoy, the highly rated left-arm seamer, was injured after the England gameHayden Walsh Jr, the legspinner, was clearly not the finished article. But he was selected for nine out of West Indies’ 17 home T20Is heading into the World Cup, and took 12 wickets while conceding 6.87 runs an over. Picking him in only two out of five Super 12s games, while Akeal Hosein, a late replacement in the squad for the injured Fabian Allen, played in all five demonstrated the inconsistency in selection.ESPNcricinfo Ltd”West Indies played close to 18 T20s leading into that World Cup,” Badree says, “but when they selected their final XI in the first game, it said to me that they hadn’t really got what they’d wanted from those games: they didn’t know what their best XI was. Leading in to the next World Cup, we have to use them strategically.”Ravi Rampaul had not played a T20 international for six years before the World Cup but was thrown in at the last minute at the age of 37 on the back of a strong CPL season; he took two wickets in four games. When McCoy was ruled out, he was replaced in the squad by Jason Holder, only a travelling reserve despite consecutive strong IPL seasons. Holder then went straight into the playing XI, leapfrogging Oshane Thomas, who had been part of the original squad.Selectors Roger Harper and Miles Bascombe have since left their roles. Desmond Haynes and Ramnaresh Sarwan, who have replaced them, must make it a priority to ensure that their decision-making is internally consistent.How about a domestic tournament other than the CPL?
After the defeat to Sri Lanka, Pollard expressed his frustration at what he saw as structural issues within West Indies cricket. “It’s something that has plagued us over a period of time, for the last ten years or so: we’ve had sort of the same guys playing T20 and dominating as we go along,” he said. “It’s the end of a generation, but there needs to be a lot of conversation on how you’re going to make the transformation from club cricket, or even CPL, to international cricket, because there’s a big step up.”In particular, Pollard highlighted how, since the start of the CPL in 2013, there has been no intermediary tournament to provide a stepping stone between club level and the CPL. “We need to have [a] tournament other than CPL where we can unearth new talents,” he said. “When we had the Caribbean T20 [which ran from 2010-13, without overseas players], that was an opportunity to bring you talent from different parts of the Caribbean to be able to have the nucleus for this last generation or so… Since CPL has come in, yes it’s a franchise-based system, but we’ve only had the opportunity to recycle the same players over and over again.”The CPL has done Caribbean cricket plenty of good, but in the absence of a domestic T20 competition beneath, West Indies have had problems surfacing good young players•Randy Brooks/CPL T20/ Getty Images”Other countries have a sort of feeder system but we don’t,” Badree says. “That means it’s the same guys you’re seeing year after year: Lendl Simmons, Andre Fletcher, Johnson Charles and these guys. We’re not seeing our young batsmen coming through because they’re not given an opportunity. As it is now, if you’re not known personally to a captain or a coach or an owner, you’re not going to get selected, and young players are suffering because of that.”The age profile of the 2021 World Cup squad reflected Badree’s point: of the 15 players available for the first game against England, only four were in the sweet spot between 26 and 32 where most players can be expected to peak. Of them, only Evin Lewis had more than 60 T20 appearances in his career.That split between the senior players and young talent could be attributed to the lack of a high-quality tournament in the region in the years between 2008 and 2013. While the disgraced Allen Stanford is despised by most West Indians, many players concede that his regional Stanford 20/20 tournaments in 2006 and 2008, and the Superstars team that played England in 2008, had a level of professionalism that had not been seen previously in West Indies limited-overs cricket.The Trinidad and Tobago side captained by Ganga and featuring the likes of Badree, Bravo, Narine, Pollard and Lendl Simmons starred in the Champions League in 2009, and won numerous short-form opportunities around the world as a result. But the generation coming through from 2009 through about 2013 – the likes of Holder, Lewis and Kyle Mayers – cut their teeth in the inter-island Caribbean T20, where a large number of teams and the absence of overseas players meant a wider player pool but a diluted standard.In the years since, the CPL has provided high-quality competition for those who have managed to earn contracts. Introducing a new inter-island competition alongside it would replicate the model seen in, for example, India, Pakistan and England, where the elite-level short-form competition (the IPL, the PSL and the Hundred respectively) is underpinned by a domestic tournament (the Syed Mushtaq Ali Trophy, the National T20 Cup and the Vitality Blast), meaning young players have the opportunity to cut their teeth at a lower level before making the step up.In practice West Indian cricket’s financial situation means the imminent introduction of such a tournament is unlikely. Unusually, the CPL bought the rights to host short-form cricket from CWI (then the WICB) in 2013, meaning that any other league would have to be run in partnership with the CPL. While that might be seen to create an unnecessary barrier, the lack of commercial viability is the bigger stumbling block for a secondary league.Though they won the World Cup in India in 2016, later that year West Indies lost 0-3 to Pakistan in the UAE, where the pitches were slower and the boundaries bigger•Francois Nel/Getty ImagesBishop says that while the CPL has been outstanding in revitalising certain facets of the game in the Caribbean, it does not necessarily provide opportunities to unearth young players from the level beneath the franchise system. “In franchise cricket, teams are privately owned and owners are looking for performance, so there is limited room for players to cut their teeth.”We need to have either an academy for CPL to unearth and develop more T20 players, or a feeder system and scouting system throughout the territories to find more young players, including a lot of batsmen, to come into CPL and perform. If you could spend time in a club system in Barbados, Guyana, Trinidad or wherever, there are young players. They just haven’t been given an opportunity to develop as quickly for this particular format.”Bishop cites the example of Justin Greaves, the Barbados batter who made his ODI debut against Ireland last week but, at 27, has faced just 110 balls in his eight-match T20 career. “You want to win the CPL but you also have to look at the bigger picture [which is] the development of West Indies cricket,” Bishop says.There is also a long-standing debate about the merits of West Indian involvement in global T20 leagues, held up as a strength when they were twice World Cup winners but often now framed as a problem. Young players often face a trade-off: should they play across formats for their island or region, developing long-form skills that might transfer into their T20 game, or expose themselves to foreign conditions and new environments, earning significantly more money in the process?”If players are getting offered big money to play in a league here, a league there, and then West Indies have a couple of smaller tours clashing, how do you say to a couple of young men: you forego thousands of dollars, take a chance, and sit here as we build for something?” Bishop says. “These guys – Romario Shepherd, Odean Smith – haven’t earned a great deal of money yet..”The West Indies aren’t a wealthy cricketing nation [but] New Zealand have the same challenges and handle it well. Sri Lanka have the same challenges.”

At the same time, leading West Indies players have lost a competitive advantage. While other boards were initially reluctant to make their players available for global leagues, they have increasingly recognised the benefits, meaning that West Indians no longer dominate the overseas player pools in franchise T20 the way they once did.

As noted in , Freddie Wilde and Tim Wigmore’s history of T20 cricket, the seven players with the most T20 appearances from 2012-16 were all West Indians; from 2017-21, they had only eight of the top 50. Before 2016, West Indian players had been ahead of the curve, picking up on trends and sharing information with their international team-mates, but since then, others have caught up.Rebuilding for 2022 (and 2024)
West Indies have nine months to turn their T20 fortunes around before this year’s World Cup in Australia, a task akin to running a marathon in half an hour. They are due to play 22 T20Is before the tournament starts in mid-October, starting with a five-match series against England in Barbados this week.Their first series after the World Cup ended in a 3-0 defeat to Pakistan last month – though that scoreline is worth taking with a pinch of salt, given the availability crisis in the squad due to a Covid outbreak. Since then, Lewis has been ruled out of the England series due to a positive test, McCoy is injured, and several players, including Shimron Hetmyer, Sherfane Rutherford and Narine are among those who did not meet the fitness criteria.Bishop identifies two players as the key men step up: Pooran and Hetmyer. “They should take centre stage,” he says. “They’ve been invested in, they’ve been around the scene now for however many years, playing in the IPL, playing internationally. They didn’t perform up to what I expected in the World Cup – they weren’t the cause of the poor World Cup, but now, in their mid-20s, is the time for them to stand up and say we can be two of the best players in the world game, following in the footsteps of the players who are the gold standard.”Both players are in their mid-20s and have been involved in the set-up for a similar length of time but are at different stages in their development. Pooran has drifted in and out of form over the last two years but is the T20I team’s vice-captain and one of the world’s most dangerous middle-order batters on his day. Hetmyer has generally batted at No. 4 for West Indies in T20Is and excelled as a finisher in the 2021 IPL for Delhi Capitals, but his fitness has been a major sticking point and Phil Simmons, the head coach, said he was “letting down himself and his team-mates”.”Sometimes I wonder if he himself knows how talented he is,” Badree, who has worked with Hetmyer at Delhi, says. “To get the sort of success that he got at such an early age, not everyone can deal with that… it might be a distraction for him. I really want someone close to him to guide him down the right path.Nicholas Pooran and Shimron Hetmyer haven’t quite delivered on their promise consistently in T20Is•Ashley Allen/CPL T20/ Getty Images”I’m hoping Shimron Hetmyer has an epiphany, because he can be a world-class talent if he wants to,” Bishop says. “If he can get his fitness going, he will take his game to another level. But to do that, he needs to get himself to optimum fitness levels, because that carries you at international level.”West Indies are also bringing through three promising seam-bowling allrounders who have excelled in the CPL and should win opportunities against England: Odean Smith, Shepherd, and Dominic Drakes (whose father, Vasbert, played 46 matches for West Indies between 1995 and 2004). Jayden Seales and Alzarri Joseph are both reserves for the series, and the Jamaicans Rovman Powell and Fabian Allen are both looking to secure spots in the lower middle order – where West Indies enjoy more depth than most international sides.”I’m seeing depth in the bowling but the batting depth, we are still searching,” Bishop says. “I’m seeing more promise in the bowling, but that still needs time with Bravo gone, and one or two others. Whether a year [between World Cups] is enough, only time will tell, but it must be a long-term venture. What we must acknowledge from a Caribbean perspective is that these guys still need time.”Badree highlights the 2024 World Cup, which West Indies are due to co-host with the USA, as a more realistic target than this year’s tournament. “Australia will be tough,” he says. “Much bouncier pitches than we’re accustomed to, and some massive boundaries. But if these young players can really develop their games over the next two or three years then there’s no reason why in 2024, we can’t win that title on home soil.”The luck of the draw
The accepted wisdom in West Indies cricket is that the failure to defend their title in 2021 was a long time coming: results in bilateral series had been poor, key players were in decline, and structural problems were not conducive to creating a side capable of competing against the best teams in the world.Three to watch: (from left) Odean Smith, Dominic Drakes and Romario Shepherd•Getty ImagesBut World Cups are short tournaments where the narrative can shift quickly. West Indies were infamously written off as “brainless” before their title in 2016 and widely considered too inconsistent to stand a chance, while India entered the 2021 tournament as strong favourites and were eliminated in the Super 12s after being thrashed in their first two games.Gaurav Sundararaman, West Indies’ analyst in the 2016 World Cup and now a senior stats analyst at ESPNcricinfo, says that T20 World Cups are “almost a lottery” given how short they are and the importance of the toss and venues. In 2016, West won six tosses out of six and chose to bowl every time, winning their five games under floodlights and losing to Afghanistan in the daytime; in 2021 they lost four tosses out of five, and were forced to bat first in all of them in a tournament were the toss was disproportionately important.”West Indies can win the World Cup in 2022 if things go their way,” Sundararaman says. “If they play at the right grounds on batting wickets and win the toss, they can. Nobody is going to criticise Pakistan’s or South Africa’s performance in 2021. What [West Indies] can do is set the path right and hope they go there, perform and make the semis [because] after that, it’s anybody’s game. It’s just the way the World Cup is. In 2016 they were very lucky; in 2021, they weren’t lucky at all.”Bishop shares a similar view: that if things click for a four-week period, anything is possible. “Who put their hand up six months ago and said Australia are going to be winning the 2021 T20 World Cup? Outside of Australia, nobody,” he says. “I’m excited about what the West Indies can do. I’m excited about the raw talent; I’m not going to write them off and say that they can’t compete.”There must be a long-term view to whatever we do. Phil Simmons and the board are going to try to develop these guys as best as possible. They’ll give it their all for this World Cup. The eight, nine months that they have, they have to give the team the opportunity to learn. They’ll play overseas, they’ll play together, they’ll play apart – but it could be a very exciting team.”

Stats – Pollard finishes as one of the best six-hitters in white-ball internationals

A look through Pollard’s major records in International cricket

Sampath Bandarupalli20-Apr-2022224 – International matches Pollard played in his career over 15 years. That’s the second-highest in men’s international cricket without a Test cap. David Miller remains ahead of Pollard, with 238 matches played across ODIs and T20Is.101 – Number of T20Is played by Pollard, making him the most-capped men’s cricketer for West Indies in the format. He is also the only player to feature in 100-plus matches in men’s T20Is without a Test cap.2 – Pollard is one of two players to six sixes in an over in T20Is. He struck six sixes in Akila Dananjaya’s third over during the first T20I of the three-match series in 2021. Yuvraj Singh was the first to record the feat, having hit six sixes off Stuart Broad during the 2007 World T20.1.2 – Sixes hit per innings by Pollard in ODI cricket, the best sixes-per-innings ratio in the format for any player (minimum of 100 sixes). Pollard, on average, hits a six every 21.23 balls in ODIs, the second-best ratio of any batter after Shahid Afridi (19.64 balls).

135 – Sixes hit by Pollard in ODI cricket, the second-highest for West Indies in the format. Only Chris Gayle is ahead of Pollard with 330 sixes in his 298-match ODI career for West Indies.3 – Pollard is one of three players with more sixes than the number of fours they hit in T20I cricket (players with 50-plus sixes). In his 101-match career, Pollard struck 99 sixes, five more than the 94 fours he hit. Andre Russell hit 62 sixes but only 42 fours, while Evin Lewis hit 110 sixes against 106 fours in the format.

99 – Sixes for Pollard in T20Is, the third-highest by any player for West Indies in the format, as only Gayle and Lewis are ahead with 124 and 110, respectively. Only seven batters have hit more sixes than Pollard in men’s T20Is.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus